Small for gestational age newborns – does pre-recognition make a difference in pregnancy outcome?

References

• McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker DJ. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:270–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Cole J, Sanderson M, et al. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:557–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker L, Mahsud-Dornan S, Dornan JC. Detection of foetal growth restriction using third trimester ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:833–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, et al. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:311–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Magann EF. Screening for fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:284–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falo AP. Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR): prenatal diagnosis by imaging. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2009;6:326–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vergani P, Roncaglia N, Ghidini A, et al. Can adverse neonatal outcome be predicted in late preterm or term fetal growth restriction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:166–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershkovitz R, Kingdom JC, Geary M, Rodeck CH. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:209–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, Meler E, et al. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:191–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIGITAT Study Group. Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;172:20–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003;110:27–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlijsdonk JW, Winkens B, Boers K, et al. Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:938–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohel G, Ruach M. Perinatal outcome of idiopathic small for gestational age pregnancies at term: the effect of antenatal diagnosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55:29–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P. Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:643–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratelli N, Valcamonico A, Prefumo F, et al. Effects of antenatal recognition and follow-up on perinatal outcomes in small-for- gestational age infants delivered after 36 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:223–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:258–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Ronald BR, Seung KP. Estimation fetal age: computer assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984;152:497–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 1992;182:501–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:451–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, et al. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2001;20:ix–xiv
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacobs N. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:353–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, et al. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1987;32:601–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epi-Info. Available from: http://www.openepi.com/v37/SampleSize/SSCohort.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lindhard A, Nielsen PV, Mouritsen LA, et al. The implications of introducing the symphyseal-fundal height-measurement: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:675–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson B, Stangenberg M, Lunell NO, et al. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;93:206–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David C, Tagliavini G, Pilu G, et al. Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1037–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reu PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, Nijhuis JG. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population. J Perinat Med 2008;36:324–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, Bar J. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;130:187–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedriana HL, Moore TR. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1600–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:304–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong CL, Francis A, Van Geijn HP, Gardosi J. Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:36–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIGITAT Study Group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010;341:c7087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar