Gestational age and fetal growth assessment among obstetricians

References

• Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:116–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direção-Geral da Saúde. Norma no. 023/2011: exames ecográficos na gravidez. In: Divisão de Saúde Sexual R, Infantil e juvenil, eds. 2011
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin J, Mohangoo A, Delnord M. European perinatal health report. Paris: Euro-Peristat; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Alexander G, Himes J, Kaufman R, Mor J, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkin PL, Aboualfa M, Eyre JA, et al. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1987;15:45–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991;181:129–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distribuição por Especialidade, Idade e Sexo – 2009. 2014. Available from: https://www.ordemdosmedicos.pt/?lop=stats_medicos&type=1&ano=2009 [last accessed 16 Oct 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth M, Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD007058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007058.pub2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock F, Shah Y, Kanon D, Lindsey J. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 1992;182:501–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almström H, et al. Ultrasound dating at 12–14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:504–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984;152:497–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill LM, Guzick D, Hixson J, et al. Composite assessment of gestational age: a comparison of institutionally derived and published regression equations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:551–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg BO, Mulder PGH, Hofman A, et al. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:323–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:278–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitz DA, Terry Jr JW, Dole N, et al. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1660–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, et al. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:975–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett KA, Crane JMG, O'Shea P, et al. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1077–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD001451. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NG, Jolley IJ, Wells JE. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:173–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, et al. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:559–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkin PL, Aboualfa M, Eyre JA, et al. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1987;15:45–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubchenco L, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth–weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963;32:793–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos RF, Miguelote RF, Coelho DM, et al. [Validity of classical fetal weight charts in the Portuguese population]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2011;33:164–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, Kramer MS. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:522–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The investigation and management of the small–for–gestational–age fetus. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 31. 2nd ed. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2013
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122–33
   Google Scholar
• Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;174:41–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J, Turan S, Baschat AA. Fetal growth restriction. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:274–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Ek S, Tambyrajia R. Screening for fetal growth restriction: a mathematical model of the effect of time interval and ultrasound error. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:908–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J. Fetal growth standards: individual and global perspectives. Lancet 2011;377:1812–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:290.e1–e6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar