References
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2010. National vital statistics reports. Vol 61, no. 1. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2012
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KL, Bloom SL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010
- Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, et al. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:285.e1–8
- Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, et al. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:33–8
- Mackeen AD, Khlifeh A, Fleisher J, et al. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1169–75
- Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD003577
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Report Card 2012. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 60. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:675–85
- Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:406–16
- Leth RA, Uldbjerg N, Nørgaard M, et al. Obesity, diabetes, and the risk of infections diagnosed in hospital and post-discharge infections after cesarean section: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:501–9
- Takoudes TC, Weitzen S, Slocum J, Malee M. Risk of cesarean wound complications in diabetic gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:958–63
- Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, et al. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:682–90
- Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1607–17
- de Graaf IM, Oude Rengerink K, Wiersma IC, et al. Techniques for wound closure at caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;165:47–52
- Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:29–33
- Juergens S, Maune C, Kezze F, et al. A randomized, controlled study comparing the cosmetic outcome of a new wound closure device with Prolene suture closing caesarean wounds. Int Wound J 2011;8:329–35
- Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, et al. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1769–80
- Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:265.e1–4
- Johnson RG, Cohn WE, Thurer RL, et al. Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized, prospective comparison of intradermal versus staple closures. Ann Surg 1997;226:606–12
- Witte MB, Barbul A. General principles of wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:509–28
- Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Probl Surg 2001;38:72–140