The influence of obstetric variables on school achievement, intelligence and neuropsychological development in a sample of Spanish twins at the age of six: a retrospective study

References

• de Zeeuw EL, van Beijsterveldt CE, de Geus EJ, Boomsma DI. Twin specific risk factors in primary school achievements. Twin Res Hum Genet 2012;15:107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbers SC, van Oort FV, Polderman TJ, et al. Trajectories of CBCL attention problems in childhood. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20:419–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt CE, Boomsma DI. Breastfeeding, maternal education and cognitive function: a prospective study in twins. Behav Genet 2009;39:616–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasamanick B, Lilienfield AM. Association of maternal and fetal factors with the development of mental deficiency: abnormalities in the prenatal and paranatal periods. JAMA 1955;159:155–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calame A, Reymond-Goni I, Maherzi M, et al. Psychological and neurodevelopmental outcome of high risk new born infants. Helv Paediatr Acta 1976;31:287–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cattani A, Bonifacio S, Ferzt M, et al. Communicative and linguistic development in preterm children: a longitudinal study from 12 to 24 months. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010;45:162–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’oglio AM, Rossiello B, Coletti MF, et al. Do healthy preterm children need neuropsychological follow-up? Preschool outcomes compared with term peers. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52:955–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espy KA, Senn TE, Charak DA, et al. Perinatal pH and neuropsychological outcomes at age 3 years in children born preterm: an exploratory study. Dev Neupsychol 2007;32:669–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrard D, Charollais A, Marret S, et al. Cognitive and emotional regulation developmental issues in preterm infants 12 and 14 months after birth. Eur J Dev Psychol 2011;8:171–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Valenzuela MJ, García-Fortea P, Delgado-Ríos M, et al. Effects of oxytocin used during delivery on development: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2014;36:680--90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray PH, Edwards DM, O’Callaghan MJ, Cuskelly M. Parenting stress in mother of preterm infants during early infancy. Early Hum Dev 2012;88:45–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunnius S, Geuze RH, Zweens MJ, Bos AF. Effects of preterm experience on the developing visual system: a longitudinal study of shifts of attention and gaze in early infancy. Dev Neuropsychol 2008;33:521–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern S, Gayraud F. Influence of preterm birth on early lexical and grammatical acquisition. First Lang 2011;27:159–73
   Google Scholar
• Roberts G, Lim J, Doyle L, Anderson P. High rates of school readiness difficulties at 5 years of age in very preterm infants compared with term controls. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2011;32:117–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolke D, Meyer R. Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6 years old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian longitudinal study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:94–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolke D, Samara M, Bracewell M, Marlow N. Specific language difficulties and school achievement in children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. J Pediatr 2008;152:256–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Szatmari P. Learning disabilities and school problems in a regional cohort of extremely low birth weight children: a comparison with term controls. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1991;12:294–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetal Health Surveillance: Antepartum and Intrapartum Consensus Guideline No. 197 (Replaces No. 90 and No. 112), JOGC, September 2007
   Google Scholar
• Portellano JA, Mateos R, Martínez-Arias R. Cumanin. Cuestionario de madurez neuropsicológica infantil. Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman AS, Kaufman, NL. Test breve de inteligencia de Kaufman (K. BIT). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones; 2000
   Google Scholar
• García-Vidal J, González-Manjón D, Ortiz BG. Batería Psicopedagógica EVALÚA-1. Madrid, España: EOS; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Simón-Areces J, Dietrich M, Hermes G, et al. Natural birth regulates neuronal differentiation of the hippocampus and related adult behavior. PLoS One 2012;7:e42911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK. Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group: a randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery or twin pregnancy. New Engl J Med 2013;369:1295–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía. Movimiento Natural de Población. Recuperado el 31 de Marzo de 2014, de Estadística de partos, nacimientos y muertes fetales tardías; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Odd D, Emond A, Whitelaw A. Long-term cognitive outcomes of infants born moderately or late preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012;54:704–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney H. Thenearterm (late preterm) human brain and risk for periventricular leukomalacia: a review. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:81–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray R, Indurkhy A, McCormick M. Prevalence, stability, and predictors of clinically significant behavior problems in low birth weight children at 3, 5, 8 years of age. Pediatrics 2004;114:736–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse S, Zheng H, Tang Y, Roth, J. Early school age outcomes of late preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009;123:622–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyi L, Lee H, Hintz S, et al. School outcomes of late preterm infants special needs and challenges for infants born at 32 to 36 weeks gestation. J Pediatr 2010;153:25–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, et al. Neurological squeal in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 2002;359:461–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schendelaar P, Van den Heuvel ER, Heineman MJ, et al. Increased time to pregnancy is associated with less optimal neurological condition in 4-year-old singletons, in vitro fertilization itself is not. Hum Reprod 2014;29:2773--86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter C, Van Acker F, Bonduelle M, et al. Cognitive and psychomotor development of 5- to 6-year-old singletons born after PGD: a prospective case-controlled matched study. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1968–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzloff M, Hornstein M. Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection safe? Fertil Steril 2003;44:303–15
   Google Scholar
• Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Bonduelle M, Barnes J, et al. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection–conceived, in vitro fertilization–conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments. Pediatrics 2005;115:283–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson D, Woodward L. Maternal age and educational and psychosocial outcomes in early adulthood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;40:479–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein M, Putnick D, Suwalsky J, Gini, M. Maternal chronological age, prenatal and perinatal history, social support and parenting of infants. J Child Dev 2006;77:277–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley R. Are children of young mothers disadvantaged because of their mother’s age or family background? J Child Dev 2003;74:465–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen H, Kesmodel U, Underbjerg M, et al. Predictors of intelligence at the age of 5: family, pregnancy and birth characteristics, postnatal influences and postanatal growth. PLoS One 2013;8:e79200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogne T, Engstrøm, AA, Jacobsen GW, et al. Fetal growth, cognitive function, and brain volumes in childhood and adolescence. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:673–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickle M, Tolsa JF, Fischer CJ. Being small for gestational age: does it matter for the neurodevelopment of premature infants? A cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125769
   Google Scholar
• Wen SW, Fung KF, Oppenheimer L, et al. Occurrence and predictors of cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:413–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armson BA, O’Connell C, Persad V, et al. Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:556–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wen SW, Chen Y, et al. Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex–vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. J Perinatol 2006;26:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Reichman B, et al. Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:52–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig PC, Veille JC, Morgan T, Henderson L. The effect of presentation and mode of delivery on neonatal outcome in the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:901–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, et al. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:220–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher D, Robinson BK, Peaceman AM. An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011;4:109--16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakano R, Takemura H. Birth order in delivery of twins. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988;25:217–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinwell ES, Blickstein I, Lusky A, Reichman B. Effect of birth order on neonatal morbidity and mortality among very low birthweight twins: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2004;89:145–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puertas A, González A, González MD, et al. Influencia del orden de nacimiento en el resultado perinatal de los partos gemelares. Ciencia Ginecologika 2005;4:209–14
   Google Scholar