Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 29, 2016 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
709
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

Kara K. HoppeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, Correspondence[email protected]
,
Melissa A. SchiffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, ;Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA,
,
Suzanne E. PetersonSwedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA, and
&
Michael G. GravettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, ;Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), Seattle Children’s, Seattle, WA, USA
Pages 1919-1925 | Received 13 May 2015, Accepted 25 Jun 2015, Published online: 13 Aug 2015

References

  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011;60:1–70
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin Induction of Labor. No. 107; 2009
  • Gelber S, Sciscione A. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:642–57
  • Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD001233
  • Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, et al. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:125.e1–7
  • Jozwiak M, Rengerink KO, Benthem M, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:2095–103
  • Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1967;74:44–8
  • Atad J, Bornstein J, Calderon I, et al. Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labour by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:146–52
  • Schultz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332
  • Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, et al. A randomized trial comparing a 30 mL and an 80 mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1632–6
  • Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Suarez-Easton S, Hallak M. Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:723–7
  • Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z, et al. Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:79–86
  • Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, et al. Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1239–45
  • Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O’Neill MJ, et al. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomized controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2009;116:1443–52
  • Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917–22
  • Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628–33
  • Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2009;176:1–257
  • Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Valencia C, Hallak M. Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;17:1765–70
  • Nielson PE, Howard BC, Crabtree T, et al. The distribution and predictive value of bishop scores in nulliparas between 37 and 42 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:281–5
  • Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565–72
  • Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Moutquin JM, Christen A. Effect of early amniotomy on the risk of dystocia in nulliparous women. The Canadian Early Amniotomy Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1145–9
  • Macones GA, Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO. The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:403.e1–5
  • Mercer BM, McNanley T, O’brien JM, et al. Early versus late amniotomy for labor induction: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;173:1321–6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.