References
- Gherman RB, Macri CJ, Gerstenfeld T, Goodwin TM. Maternal mortality at LAC/USC Women’s Hospital: a 17-year review. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:S44–5
- Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;7:CD004732
- Xu LL, Chau AM, Zuschmann A. Blunt vs sharp uterine expansion at lower segment cesarean section delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:62–8
- Saad AF, Rahman M, Costantine MM, Saade GR. Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:684–5
- Combs CA, Murphy EL, Laros RK. Factors associated with hemorrhage in caesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:77–82
- Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Patterson AR. Effect of type of anesthesia on blood loss at cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:328–32
- Kamani AA, McMorland GH, Wadsworth LD. Utilization of red blood cell transfusion in an obstetric setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:1177–81
- Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1607–17
- Rodriguez AI, Porter KB, O’Brien WF. Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low-segment transverse cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:1022–5
- Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Bufkin L, et al. Intra-operative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2002;109:448–52
- Clark SL. Cesarean section. In: Hankins GDV, Clark SL, Cunningham FG, Gilstrap LC, eds. Operative obstetrics. Norwalk (CT): Appleton & Lange; 1995:301–32
- Abuhamad A, O’Sullivan MJ. Operative techniques for cesarean section. In: Planche WC, Morrison JC, O’Sullivan MJ, eds. Surgical obstetrics. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 1992:417–29
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:292–6