References
- Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:140–4
- Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204–10
- Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001;286:1340–8
- Honest H, Hyde CJ, Khan KS. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: no good test for predicting a spontaneous preterm birth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012;24:422–33
- Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–70
- To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1849–53
- Althuisius S, Dekker G. Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage. Clin Perinatol 2004;31:695–720
- Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:375e1–8
- Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:181–92
- Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Practice Bulletin No. 142. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:372–9
- Baxter JK, Airoldi J, Berghella V. Short cervical length after history-indicated cerclage: is a reinforcing cerclage beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1204–7
- Fox NS, Gelber SE, Kalish RB, Chasen ST. History-indicated cerclage: practice patterns of maternal-fetal medicine specialists in the USA. J Perinat Med 2008;36:513–17
- Iams JD, Grobman WA, Lozitska A, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Adherence to criteria for transvaginal ultrasound imaging and measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:365e1–5
- McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957;64:346–50
- Gabriel KR. A simple method of multiple comparisons of means. J Am Stat Assoc 1978;73:724–9
- Berwick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 12: survival analysis. Crit Care 2004;8:389–94
- Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:830–5
- Macdonald R, Smith P, Vyas S. Cervical incompetence: the use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:211–16
- Fox R, Holmes R, James M, et al. Serial transvaginal ultrasonography following McDonald cerclage and repeat suture insertion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;38:27–30
- Hedriana HL, Lanouette JM, Haesslein HC, et al. Is there value for serial ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lengths after a cerclage? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:705.e1–e6
- Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O'Neill L, et al. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:346–50
- Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:516–23