References
- Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:761–71.
- Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:371–82.
- Dreisler E, Stampe Sørensen S. Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population. Fertil Steril 2014;102:525–9.
- Cogendez E, Dolgun ZN, Sanverdi I, et al. Post-abortion hysteroscopy: a method for early diagnosis of congenital and acquired intrauterine causes of abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;156:101–4.
- Helm P, Stampe Sørensen S. Pregnancy outcome after metroplasty in women with Müllerian anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67:215–18.
- Takami M, Aoki S, Kurasawa K, et al. A classification of congenital uterine anomalies predicting pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:691–7.
- Sendag F, Mermer T, Yucebilgin S, et al. Reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty for uterine septum. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;37:287–9.
- Meis PJ, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:562–7.
- Marcus S, al-Shawaf T, Brinsden P. The obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women with congenital uterine malformation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:85–9.
- Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:157–62.
- Zhang Y, Zhao YY, Qiao J. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:418–22.
- Ravasia DJ, Brain PH, Pollard JK. Incidence of uterine rupture among women with Müllerian duct anomalies who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:877–81.
- Erez O, Dukler D, Novack L, et al. Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:537.e1–11.
- Fox NS, Roman AS, Stern EM, et al. Type of congenital uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:949–53.
- Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, et al. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:558.e1–5.
- The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944–55
- Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661–6.
- Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, et al. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:311–14.
- Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. . Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277–81.
- Proctor JA, Haney AF. Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss is associated with uterine septum but not with bicornuate uterus. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1212–15.
- Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, Ludmir J. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:553–6.