The effects of high stimulus rate on the electrocochleogram in normal-hearing subjects: El efecto de una alta tasa de estimulacion en la electrococleografia de sujetos normoyentes

References

• Campbell K CM, Abbas P J. The effect of stimulus rate on the auditory brainstem response in tumour and nontumour patients. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30: 494–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charlet de Sauvage R, Aran J M. Clinical value of adaptation measurements in electrocochleography. Electrocochleography, R J Ruben, C Eberling, G Salomon. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 169–182
   Google Scholar
• Chatrian G E, Wirch A L, Edwards K H, Lettich E, Snyder J M. Cochlea summating potential to broadband clicks detected from human external meatus: a study of subjects with normal hearing for age. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 130–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappa K H, Gladstone K J, Young R R. Brainstem auditory evoked responses: studies of waveform variations in normal human subjects. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A C. The summating potential and Ménière's disease I. Summating potential amplitude in Ménière and non-Ménière ears. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon B J, Gibson W P. Electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Méniére's disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 480–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauman R, Aran J M, Portmann M. Summating potential and water balance in Méniére's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 389–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Allen A, Starr A. Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brainstem response in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 86: 186–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant J D, Wang J, Ding D L, Salvi R J. Are inner or outer hair cells the source of summating potentials recorded from the round window?. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 370–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J. Basic principles for electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 316(suppl)7–16
   Google Scholar
• Gerling I J, Finitzo-Hieber T. Auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in normal and patient populations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 119–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson W PR, Prasher D, Kilkenny G. Diagnostic significance of transtympanic electrocochleography in Ménière's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 155–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J W. Handbook of evoked responses. Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts 1992
   Google Scholar
• Haapaniemi J, Laurikainen E, Johansson R, Karjalainen S. Transtympanic versus tympanic membrane electrocochleography in examining cochleovestibular disorders. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2000; 543(suppl)127–129
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R V. Rate versus intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pigs and human cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 78: 284–290
   Google Scholar
• Huck S W, Cormiser W H, Brunds W G. Reading statistics and research. Harper and Row Publishers, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Z D. Binaural interaction and the effects of stimulus intensity and stimulus rate in human auditory brain-stem. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 100: 505–516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindman H R. Analysis of variance in complex experimental design. WH Freeman, San Francisco 1974
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 4th edn. Academic Press, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Mourney D F, Berlin C I, Cullen J K, Hughes L F. Changes in human eighth nerve action potential as a function of stimulus rate. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 551–554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Northern J L. Clinical measurement procedures in impedance audiometry. Clinical impedance audiometry, 2nd edn., J Jerger, J L Northern. American Electromedics, Acron 1980; 19–39
   Google Scholar
• Pickles J O. An introduction to the physiology of hearing, 2nd edn. Harcourt Brace Janovich, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Pratt H, Sohmer H. Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man. Arch Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 212: 85–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt H, BenDavid Y, Peled R, Podoshin L, Scharf B. Auditory brainstem evoked potentials: clinical promise of increasing stimulus rate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 51: 80–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rolland J AB, Walsh P B. Fistulas of the round windows. Aust J Otolaryngol 1994; 1: 463–469
   Google Scholar
• Sass K. Sensitivity and specificity of transtympanic electrocochleography in Ménière's disease. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 150–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott M L, Harkins S W. Amplitude of the brain stem auditory evoked response: the effect of interstimulus interval. Int J Neurosci 1978; 8: 147–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soucek S, Mason M. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses in the elderly. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 149–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soustiel J F, Hafner H, Chistyakov A V, et al. Brain-stem trigeminal and auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: physiological insights. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 100: 152–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens S DG, Charlet de Sauvage R, Aran J M. Adaptation de l'e'ectrocochleogramme: note preliminare. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1974; 95: 129–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton A RD, Coleman M J. The adaptation of cochlear and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 31: 428–441
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe I. Incidence of Ménière's disease, including some other epidemiological data. Ménière's disease: a comprehensive appraisal, W J Oosterveld. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1983; 9–24
   Google Scholar
• Wuyts F L, Van de Heyning P H, Van Spaendonck M, et al. Rate influences on tone burst summating potential amplitude in electrocochleography: clinical and experimental data. Hear Res 2001; 152: 1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yagi T, Kago K. The effects of the click stimulus rate on the latency of the auditory brainstem response and its clinical use for neurological diagnosis. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979; 222: 91–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar