Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 41, 2002 - Issue 8
Submit an article Journal homepage
23
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Intra-and intersubject comparison of cochlear implant systems using the Esprit and the Tempo+ behind-the-ear speech processor: Comparacion intra e inter-personal de los sistemas de implante coclear utilizando los procesadores de lenguaje retroauriculares Esprit y Tempo+

Martin Kompis University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland
,
Martin Jenk University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland
,
Mattheus W. Vischer University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland
,
Eberhard Seifert University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland
,
Rudolf Häusler University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland
&
Martin Kompis University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Pages 555-562 | Received 09 Nov 2001, Accepted 06 Mar 2002, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Allum J H, Greisiger R, Straubhaar S, Carpenter M G. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 293–303
  • Brill S M, Gstottner W, Helms J, et al. Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. Am J Otol 1997; 18(suppl)S104–S106
  • Eddington D K. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 885–891
  • Fishman K E, Shannon R V, Slattery W H. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 1201–1215
  • Hamzavi J, Franz P, Baumgartner W D, Gstoettner W. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Audiology 2001; 40: 26–31
  • Helms J, Muller J, Schon F, et al. Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the CIS PRO+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001; 63: 31–40
  • Kelsay D M, Tyler R S. Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 866–873
  • Kempf H G, Tempel S, Johann K, Lenarz T. Komplikationen der Cochlear Implant-Chirurgie bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Laryngorhinootologie 1999; 78: 529–537
  • Kiefer J, Müller J, Pfennigdorff T, et al. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral Peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1996; 58: 127–135
  • Kiefer J, Hohl S, Sturzebecher E, Pfennigdorff T, Gstoettner W. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 2001; 40: 32–42
  • Kompis M, Dillier N. Performance of an adaptive beam-forming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. I. Prediction of the signal-to-noise-ratio improvement. J Acoust Soc Am 2001a; 109: 1123–1133
  • Kompis M, Dillier N. Performance of an adaptive beam-forming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 2001b; 109: 1134–1143
  • Kompis M, Vischer M, Häusler R. Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999; 119: 659–664
  • McDermott H J, McKay C M, Vandali A E. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 3367–3371
  • Pelizzone M, Boëx-Spano C, Sigrist A, et al. First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 622–628
  • Totten C, Cope Y, McCormick B. Early experience with the cochlear ESPrit ear-level speech processor in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 73–75
  • Tyler R S, Parkinson A J, Woodworth G G, Lowder M W, Gantz B J. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear Implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 508–522
  • Weston S C, Waltzman S B. Performance as a function of time: a study of three cochlear implant devices. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 165: 19–24
  • Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R T, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.