Hearing threshold levels for an otologically unscreened, non-occupationally noise-exposed population in Sweden: Umbrales auditivos en una población no estudiada, sin exposición a ruido ocupacional en Suecia

References

• Acoustical Society of America. Draft American National Standard, Evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. ASA, New York 1991; 97, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Arbetarskyddsstyrelsens Författnin gssamling (2000) Duller—Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen kungörelse med föreskrifter om buller samt allmänna råd om tillämpningen av föreskrifter. Publikationsservice, Solna 2000; 15, AFS
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S, Ivarsson U. A data bank on hearing and use of hearing protection among 45 000 workers in small industries. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 85, E Zwicker, H Steinhardt. Bundesanstalt fûr Arbeitsschutz, Dortmund 1985; 1375–1378
   Google Scholar
• Berger E H, Killion M C. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86(4)1392–1403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg E, Canlon B, Engström B. Noise-induced hearing loss. Literature review and experiments in rabbits. Scand Audiol 1995; 24(suppl 40)1–147
   Google Scholar
• Bowater R, Copas J B, Machado O A, Davis A C. Hearing impairment and the log-normal distribution. Appl Statistics 1996; 45(2)203–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant L J, Fozard J L. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(2)813–820
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol 1968, suppl 236: 135
   Google Scholar
• Chung D Y, Mason K, Gannon R P, Willson G N. The ear effect as function of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 1277–1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J L, Roeser R J. Three studies comparing performance of the ER-3A Tubephone with the TDH-50P Earphone. Ear Hear 1988; 9(5)268–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland J E, Feldman A S, Grimes C T, . An overview of noise exposure and hearing conservation in industry. Hearing conservation in industry, A Feldman, C Grimes, et al. Williams&Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Davis A. Hearing in adults. Whurr, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Davis A C, Ostri B, Parving A. Longitudinal study of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1991; 476: 12–22
   Google Scholar
• Dowson S P, McNeill H A, Torr G R. The performance and calibration of TDH39 earphones fitted with Model 51 and MX41/AR cushions. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 419–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driscoll D P, Royster L H. Comparison between the median hearing threshold level for an unscreened black nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and four presbycusis data bases. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1984; 45(9)577–593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank T, Williams D L. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 201–212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank T, Wright D C. Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems. Ear Hear 1990; 11(1)70–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geier S R, Kent B, Mellard T J, . Audiometric and audiological aspects of occupational hearing conservation programs. Occupational hearing loss, M Miller, C Silverman, et al. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1984; 151–181
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A, Roberts J. Hearing levels of adults by age and sex, United States 1960–1962. National Center for Health Statistics, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1965, Series 11 No. 11
   Google Scholar
• Hansson C. Hörtröskeln hos 20–65 åriga kvinnor. Examen-sarbete no. 2. Landstingets högskola, Enheten för vårdforskning, Hässleholm 1993
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Threshold of hearing by air conduction as a function of age and sex for otologically normal persons. ISO, Geneva 1984, ISO 7029
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—audiometric test methods—part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO, Geneva 1989, ISO 8253–1
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. ISO, Geneva 1990, ISO 1999
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment—part 2: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones. ISO, Geneva 1994, ISO 389–2
   Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Arlinger S. The development of noise-induced hearing loss in the Swedish County of östergötland in the 1980s and the 1990s. Noise Health 2001; 3(10)15–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson D. Derivation of presbyacusis and noise induced permanent threshold shift (NIPTS) to be used for the basis of a standard on the effects of noise on hearing. Wright-Patterson Air-Force Base, Ohio 1978, AMRL-TR-78–128
   Google Scholar
• Kannan P M, Lipscomb D M. Bilateral hearing asymmetry in large population. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55(5)1092–1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M C, Berger E H. Noise attenuating earphones for audiometric testing. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81(suppl l)5–6
   Google Scholar
• Killion M C, Villchur E. Comments on ‘Earphones in audiometry’ [Zwislocki et al. (1988). J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85(4)1775–1778
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter K D. The effects of noise on man. Academic Press, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren F, Berger E H. Influence of insertion depth of an insert earphone on hearing threshold levels and on real ear attenuation values. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86(suppl 1)44
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Davis A C. The distribution of hearing threshold levels in the general population aged 18–30 years. Audiology 1994; 33: 327–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milne J S. A longitudinal study of hearing loss in older people. Br J Audiol 1977; 11: 7–14
   Google Scholar
• Mo&Scar;cicki E K, Elkins E F, Baum H M, McNamara P M. Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear Hear 1985; 6(4)184–190
   Google Scholar
• Passchier-Vermeer W. Occupational noise exposure and hearing—An analysis of recent publications on age-related hearing threshold levels and on hearing threshold levels of occupational noise-exposed populations. TNO Institute of Prevention Health Care, Leiden 1988, publication no. 88056
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen K E, Rosenhall U, Moller M B. Changes in puretone thresholds in individuals aged 70–81: results from a longitudinal study. Audiology 1989; 28: 194–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirilä T, Jounio-Ervasti K, Sorri M. Hearing asymmetry among left-handed and right-handed persons in a random population. Scand Audiol 1991a; 20: 223–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirilä T, Sorri M, Jounio-Ervasti K, Sipilä P, Karjalainen H. Hearing asymmetry among occupationally noise-exposed men and women under 60 years of age. Scand Audiol 1991b; 20: 217–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson D W. Threshold of hearing as a function of age and sex for the typical unscreened population. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 5–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Svanborg A. Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 1990; 11(4)257–263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royster L, Royster J, Berger E. Guidelines for developing an effective hearing conservation program. Sound Vibration 1982; 16: 22–25
   Google Scholar
• Rudin R, Rosenhall U, Svärdsudd K. Hearing capacity in samples of men from the general population. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Sweden. 2000; Vol. 86, Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2000,örebro Statistics Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Stewart A. The comprehensive hearing conservation program. Hearing conservation in industry, schools and the military, D Lipscomb. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1994; 81–230
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland H C, Gasaway D C. Current hearing threshold levels for noise-exposed US Air Force personnel: one year's reportings. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 1978, Report SAM-TR-78–39
   Google Scholar
• Toppila E. A systems approach to individual hearing conservation. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki 2000
   Google Scholar
• Willott J F. Aging and the auditory system: anatomy, physiology, and psychophysics. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1991
   Google Scholar
• Winkler R L, Hays W L. Statistics: probability, inference and decision, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1975; 296–299
   Google Scholar
• Wright A, Davis A, Bredberg G, et al. Hair cell distributions in the normal human cochlea. A report of a European working group. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1987; 436: 15–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar