Otoacoustic Emissions in the General Adult Population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: I. Distributions by Age, Gender, and Ear Side: Emisiones Otoacústicas En La Poblacioan Adulta General De Nord-Trøndelag, Noruega: I. Distribuciones Por Edad, Género Y Oído Estudiado

References

• Arnold D J, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Influence of ultra-high frequency hearing on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions levels in humans. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1996; 19: 25, (abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef I, Horowitz G, Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 612–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1993; 32: 12–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilger B C, Matthies M L, Hammel D R, Demorest M E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 418–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borchgrevink H M, Tambs K, Hoffman H J. The Nord-Trøndelag Norway audiometric survey 1996–98. Unscreened adult high frequency threshold, normative thresholds and noiserelated socio-acusis. Noise and Health. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 378–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray P. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions and the development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. University of London, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Burns E, Hoberg Arehart K, Campbell S L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1571–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Time-frequency signal representation of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo Wigner distribution. Report TA129, 1–18. Technical Audiology. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 1993
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Otoacoustic emissions: measurement, data and interrelations. Acustica 1998; 84: 320–8
   Google Scholar
• Coren S, Hakstian A R. Methodological implications of interaural correlation: count heads not ears. Percept Psychophys 1990; 48(3): 291–4
   Google Scholar
• Dorn P A, Piskorski P, Keefe D H, Neely S T, Gorga M P. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(2 Pt 1): 964–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Parbo J, Johnsen N J, Bagi P. Evoked acoustic emission: Clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1985; 421(Suppl)77–85
   Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Woxen O, Arnesen A R, Mair I W. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions as screening for hearing losses at the school for military training. Scand Audiol 1996; 25(1): 71–8
   Google Scholar
• Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product; 2f1-f2; from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(2): 821–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B M. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94(5): 2639–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B M, Beauchaine K L, Kaminski J R, Liu Z. Towards understanding the limits of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96(3): 1494–500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Stover L, Bergman B M, Beauchaine K L, Kaminski J R. The application of otoacoustic emissions in the assessment of developmentally delayed patients. Scand Audiol Suppl 1995; 41(24): 8–17
   Google Scholar
• Hotz M A, Probst R, Harris F P, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 478–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Jerger S, Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry. I. Normal and sensorineural ears. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 96(6): 513–23
   Google Scholar
• Job A, Grateau P, Picard J. Intrinsic differences in hearing performances between ears revealed by the asymmetrical shooting posture in the army. Hear Res 1998; 122(1–2): 119–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen N J, Bagi P, Parbo J, Elberling C. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear IV. Final results in 100 neonates. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 27–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M C. The projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis. Bath: University of Bath. 1983
   Google Scholar
• Karzon R K, Garcia P, Peterein J L, Gates G A. Distortion prodcuct otoacoustic emssions in the elderly. Am J Otol 1994; 15(5): 596–605
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S. Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1991; 482: 73–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography-practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LePage E L, Murray N M. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: comparing emission strengths with pure tone audiometric thresholds. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15(2): 9–22
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Whitehead M L, Martin G K. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34(5): 964–81
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, McCoy M J, Whitehead M L, Martin G K. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 1(1): 11–22
   Google Scholar
• Lucertini M, Bergamashi A, Urbani L. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in occupational medicine as an auditory screening test for employment. Br J Audiol 1996; 30: 79–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 68: 143–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions; spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N M, LePage E L. Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of ageing of the inner ear in an Australian population. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15(2): 9–70
   Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Widen J E. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues. Ear Hear 1990; 11(2): 121–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B A, Falter S R. COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age. Ear Hear 1995; 16(5): 521–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Harris F P. A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 91–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89(5): 2027–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette M S, Glattke T J. Otoacoustic emissions. Clinical applications. Thieme, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Kim D O. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults. Hear Res 1992; 58: 227–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Norton S J. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94(5): 2670–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse A L, Ochs M T, Hall J W. Evidence against the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7(5): 339–45
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge C L, Long G R, Murphy W J, Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear Res 1993; 71: 170–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambs K, Hoffman H J, Borchgrevink H M, Holmen J. Hearing loss induced by noise, ear infections and head injuries in a large Norwegian sample. Scand Audiol 2002
   Google Scholar
• Wand M P, Jones M C. Kernel smoothing. Chapman and Hall., London 1995
   Google Scholar