References
- British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for pure- lone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. British Journal of Audiology 1981; 15: 213–216
- Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustics Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear & Hearing 1986; 7(4)257–265
- Dillon H. Hearing aids. Boomerang Press, Sydney 2001
- Dreschler W. A., Verschuure H., Ludvigsen C., Westermann S. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing aid assessment. Audiology 2001; 40: 148–157
- Elberling C. Loudness scaling revisited. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1999; 10(5)248–260
- Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature test (FAAF)- linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. British Journal of Audiology 1987; 21: 165–174
- Gantz B. J., Woodworth G. G., Abbas P. J., Knutson J. F., Tyler R. S. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multi-channel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1993; 102: 909–916
- Gatehouse S., Elberling C., Naylor G. Aspects of auditory ecology and psychoacoustic function as determinants of benefits from and candidature for non-linear processing in hearing aids. Auditory models and non-linear hearing instruments, 18th Danavox Symposium. Auditory models and non-linear hearing instruments, 18th Danavox Symposium. 1999; 221–233
- Knutson J. F., Schartz H. A., Gantz B. J., Tyler R. S., Hinriches J. V., Woodworth G. W. Psychological change following 18 months of cochlear implant use. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1991; 100: 877–882
- Lunner T., Hellgren J., Arlinger S., Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms. Ear & Hearing 1997a; 18(1)12–25
- Lunner T., Hellgren J., Arlinger S., Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms. Ear & Hearing 1997b; 33(4)363–376
- Lyxell B., Andersson J., Arlinger S., Bredberg G., Harder H., Ronnberg J. Verbal information-processing capabilities and cochlear implants: implications for preoperative predictors of speech performance. Studies in Deaf Education 1996; 1(3)190–201
- Macrae J., Dillon H. Gain, frequency response, and maximum output requirements for hearing aids. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 1986; 33(4)363–376
- Naylor G. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearing aids. Scandinavian Audiology 1997; 26(4)223–229
- Wingfield A. Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1996; 7: 175–182