Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view

References

• Bentler R. A., Kramer S. E. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(suppl 4)37S–49S
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R. A., Niebuhr D. P., Getta J. P., Anderson C. V. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36(4)820–831
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bess F. H. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(suppl 4)74S–79S
   Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. NEO-PI-R Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1992
   Google Scholar
• Cox R., Alexander G. C. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. Ear and Hearing 1992; 13(3)131–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear and Hearing 1995; 16(2)176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL Scale. Ear and Hearing 1999; 20((4))306–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. Validation of the SADI. Questionnaire. Ear and Hearing 2001a; 22: 151–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. Is it all in your head? Relationships between personality and outcomes. Presented at Hearing aid outcome measures: A CHARTTing the Course Research Conference. Bloomington, TN 2001b
   Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (TOI-HA); psychometric properties of the English version. International Journal of Audiology 2002; 41(1)30–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C., Gray G. A. Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1999; 10(1)1–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R. M., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H., Bentler R., et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(4 Suppl)106S–115S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G., Sutton J. P. Rehab 2000: the evolution of medical rehabilitation in American health care. Outcome-oriented rehabilitation: principles, strategies and tools for effective program management, P. K. Landrum, M. S. Schmidt, A. McLean. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD 1995; 3–42
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Shortened Hearing Aid Performance Inventory for the Elderly (SHAPTE): a statistical approach. Australian Journal of Audiology 1994; 16((1))37–48
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., Birtles G., Lovegrove R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COST) and the Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ). Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1999; 10(2)67–79
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., James A., Ginis J. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1997; 8: 27–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H., So M. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcomes measures by clinicians. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(suppl 4)2S–6S
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing 1994; 15(1)30–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1999; 10((2))80–103
   Google Scholar
• Goetz S. M., Stuck A. E., Hirschi A., Gillman G., Dapp V., Minder C. S., et al. A multidimensional questionnaire as a component of preventive geriatric assessment: comparison of the self-assessment version with the interview version. Sozial-und Praventivmedizin 2000; 45((3))134–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grilo C. M., Masheb R. M., Wilson G. T. Different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder: a replication. Obesity Research 2001; 9((7))418–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haggard M. P., Foster J. R., Iredale F. E. Use and benefit of postaural aid in sensory hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology 1981; 10((1))45–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E., Garner C. B., Wilson D. L., Barlow N. N. Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research 2001; 44((3))469–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E., Hailing D., Coughlin M. Reliability and stability of various hearing-aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39(5)923–935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde M. Reasonable psychometric standards for outcomes selfreport scales. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(suppl 4)24S–37S
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan C. P., Hilton J. F., Park-Tanjasirir S., Perez-Stable E. J. The effect of data collection mode on smoking attitudes and behavior in young African American and Latina women. Face-to- face interview versus self-administered questionnaires. Evaluation Review 2001; 25(4)454–473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kochkin S., Rogin C. Quantifying the obvious: the impact of healing instruments on quality of life. Hearing Review 2000; 7((1))6–34
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S. E., Goverts S. T., Dreschler W. A., Boymans M., Festen J. M. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (1OI-HA): results from the Netherlands. International Journal of Audiology 2002; 41(1)36–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinoff R. L., Weinstein B. E. Changes in self-assessment of hearing handicap over the first year of hearing aid use by older adults. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 1989; 22: 54–60
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. The Hearing Measurement Scale as a paper-pencil form: preliminary results. Journal of the American Auditory Society 1979; 5(2)95–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W. Extending the IOI to the significant other and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. International Journal of Audiology 2002; 41(1)27–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley E. D., Chaisson R. E., Robnett T. J., Vertefeuille J., Strathdee S. A., Vlahov D. Use of audio computer-assisted self- interviews to assess tuberculosis-related risk behaviors. American Journal of Respiration and Critical Care Medicine 2001; 164(1)82–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens D., Jones G., Gianopoulos I. The use of outcome measures to formulate intervention strategies. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21(suppl 4)15S–23S
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I. M., Weinstein B. E. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a new tool. Ear and Hearing 1982; 128–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson D., Pennebaker J. W. Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review 1989; 96: 234–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein B. E., Spitzer J. B., Ventry I. M. Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Ear and Hearing 1986; 7(5)295–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. WHO, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar