Candidacy and management of assistive listening devices: special needs of the elderly

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiology service delivery in nursing homes. ASHA 1997; 39(suppl 17)15–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language- Hearing Association. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. Am J Audiol 1998; 7: 5–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batavia A. I., Hammer G. S. Consumer criteria for evaluating assistive devices: Implications for technology transfer. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America, J. J. Presperin. RESNA Press, Washington, D.C. 1989; 194–195
   Google Scholar
• Beaulac D. A., Pehringer J. L., Shough L. F. Assistive listening devices: available options. Semin Hear 1989; 10: 11–30
   Google Scholar
• Beck L. B., Nance G. C. Hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and telephone issues to consider. Semin Hear 1989; 10: 78–89
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M., Blumenfeld V., Cascardo D. Age-related decrement in hearing for speech; sampling and longitudinal studies. J Gerontol 1976; 31: 533–538
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blazer D. G., Williams C. D. Epidemiology of dysphoria and depression in an elderly population. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980; 137: 439–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe F. Why seniors don't use technology. Technol Rev, August/September 1988; 91: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Brandt F. D. Microphones and assistive listening devices: a tutorial. Semin Hear 1989; 10: 31–41
   Google Scholar
• Brooks D. N. Factors relating to the under-use of postaural hearing aids. J Audiol 1985; 19: 211–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruck D. The who, what, where and why of waking to fire alarms: a review. Fire Safety J 2001; 36: 623–639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll M., Phillips B. Survey on Assistive Technology Abandonment by New Users (Cooperative Agreement No, H133E0016). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC 1993
   Google Scholar
• Chafee C. Rehabilitation needs of nursing home patients: a report of a survey. Rehabil Literature 1967; 18: 37–38
   Google Scholar
• Compton C. L. Assistive technology for the enhancement of receptive communication. Rehabilitative Audiology: Children and Adults, J. G. Alpiner, P. A. McCarthy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cooper J. C., Gates G. A. Hearing in the elderly-The Framingham Cohort, 1983–1985: Part 11. Prevalence of central auditory processing disorders. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 304–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell C., Lewis M. S. Coupling strategies for FM systems. Adv Speech-Pathol Audiol 2001; 11(5)
   Google Scholar
• Crandell C., Smaldino J. Room acoustics and auditory rehabilitation technology. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins., Philadelphia 2002; 607–630
   Google Scholar
• Crose R., Leventhal E. A., Haug M. R., Burns E. A. The challenges of aging. Health Care for Women: Psychological, Social, and Behavioral Influences, S. J. Gallant, G. P. Keita, R. Royak-Schaler. American Psychological Association, Washington. DC 1997; 221–234
   Google Scholar
• Davidson S. J., Noc C. M. Programmable telecoil responses: potential advantages for assistive listening device fittings. Am J Audiol 1994; 3: 59–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson D., Hendershot G., Fulton T. Aging in the Eighties, Functional Limitations of Individuals Age 65 and Over. Advance Data for Vital and Health Statistics. (No 133, DHHS Publ. No PHS 87–1250). Public Health Service, Hyattsville, MD 1987
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey J. J., Ross M. Evaluation of hardwire personal assistive listening deices. Am J Audiol 1994; 4: 71–77
   Google Scholar
• Dillion H., Birtles G., Lovegrove R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 67–79
   Google Scholar
• Freeman S. A., Field WE. Selection of rural assistive technology using a hypercard-based knowledge system. Assistive Technol 1994; 6: 126–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galvin J. C. Assistive technology: Federal policy and practise since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997; 6: 3–15
   Google Scholar
• Garstecki D. C. Considerations in selecting assistive devices for hearing-impaired adults. J Acad Reh Aud 1988; 21: 153–157
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin L. N. Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations 1995; 19: 41–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurland B. The comparative frequency of depression in various adult age groups. J Gerontol 1976; 31: 283–292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins D. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49: 409–418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins D. B., Schum D. J. Some effects of FM coupling on hearing aid characteristics. J Speech Hear Disord 1985; 50: 132–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins D., Yacullo W. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49: 278–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes D., Jerger J. Aging and the use of hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 33–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedner K., Broms P., Harris S., Steen B. Hearing in geriatric long stay patients. Comp Gerontol 1987; 1: 69–71
   Google Scholar
• Hegner B., Caldwell E. Assisting in Long-term Care. Delmar Publishers, Albany, NY 1994, 2nd edn.
   Google Scholar
• Hétu R. The stigma attached to hearing impairment. Scand Audiol 1996; 25(suppl 43)12–24
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 161–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson G. P., Newman C. W., Fabry D. A., Sandridge S. A. Development of the three-clinic hearing aid selection profile (HASP). J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 128–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Chmiel R., Florin E., Pirozzolo F., Wilson N. Comparison of conventional amplification and assistive listening devices in elderly persons. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 490–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane R., Ouslander J., Abrass I. Essentials of Clinical Geriatrics. McGraw Hill, New York 1994, 3rd edn.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan H. Assistive devices for the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 203–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killion M. C. The SIN report: circuits haven't solved the hearing-in-noise problem. Hear J 1997; 50: 28–32
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. MarkeTrak III identifies key factors in determining customer satisfaction. Hear J 1993; 46: 39–44
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. Customer satisfaction and subjective benefit with high-performance hearing aids. Hear Rev 1996; 3: 16–26
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. Subjective measures of satisfaction and benefit: establishing norms. Semin Hear 1997; 18: 37–48
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S., Rogin CM. Quantifying the obvious: the impact of hearing instruments on quality of life. Hear Rev 2000; 7: 6–24
   Google Scholar
• Kricos P. B., Lesner S. A. Hearing Care for the Older Adult: Audiologic Rehabilitation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1995
   Google Scholar
• Kricos P. B., Lesner S. A., Sandridge S. A., Yanke R. Perceived benefits of amplification as a function of central status in the elderly. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 337–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko C. P. Application of advanced hearing instrument systems with children. Semin Hear 1999; 20: 213–220
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt R. Considerations for use of rehabilitation technology by hearing impaired persons. Semin Hear 1989; 10: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Lesner S. A., Klingler M. S. Considerations in establishing an optimum assistive listening device center. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1995; 28: 60–67
   Google Scholar
• Lewsen B. J., Cashman M. Hearing aids and assistive listening devices in long-term care. J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol 1997; 21: 149–152
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski R. Communication technologies for the elderly: vision, hearing, and speech. Communication Technologies for the Elderly: Vision, Hearing and Speech, R. Lubinski, D. J. Higginbotham. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1997; 1–21
   Google Scholar
• Mann W. C. Aging and assistive technology use. Technol Disabil 1997; 6: 63–75
   Google Scholar
• Mann W. C., Hurren D., Charvat B., Tomita M. The use of phones by elders with disabilities: problems, interventions, costs. Assistive Technol 1996; 8: 23–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann W. C., Hurren D., Tomita M. R. Assistive device needs of home-based elderly persons with hearing impairments. Technol Disabil 1994; 3: 47–61
   Google Scholar
• Mann W. C., Hurren D., Tomita M., Charvat B. A. The relationship of functional dependence to assistive device use of elderly persons living at home. J Appl Gerontol 1995; 14: 225–247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann W. C., Tomita M. Perspectives on assistive devices among elderly persons with disabilities. Technol Disabil 1998; 9: 119–148
   Google Scholar
• McCandless G. A., Parkin J. L. Hearing aid performance relative to site of lesion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1979; 87: 871–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montano J. Rehabilitation technology for the hearing impaired. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 638–654, 4th edn.
   Google Scholar
• Nábelek A. K., Donahue A. M. Comparison of amplification systems in an auditorium. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 2078–2082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nábelek A. K., Donahue A. M., Letowski T. R. Comparison of amplification systems in a classroom. J Rehabil Res Dev 1986; 23: 41–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nábelek A. K., Picket J. M. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 724–739
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nábelek A. K., Robinson P. K. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 1242–1248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Aging in the Eighties, Functional Limitations of Individuals Age 65 and Over. Advance Data for Vital and Health Statistics. Public Health Service, No. 133, DHHS Publ. No. PHS 87–1250. Hyattsville MD 1987
   Google Scholar
• Noe C. M., Davidson S. A., Mishler P. J. The use of large group assistive listening devices with and without hearing aids in an adult classroom setting. Am J Audiol 1997; 6: 48–62
   Google Scholar
• Ouslander J., Osterweil D., Morley J. Medical Care in the Nursing Home. McGraw-Hill, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Palmer C. V. Assistive devices in the audiology practice. Am J Audiol 1992; 2: 37–57
   Google Scholar
• Parette H. P., Van Biervliet A. Tentative findings of a study of the technology needs and use patters of persons with mental retardation. J Intellectual Disability Res 1992; 36: 7–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B., Broadnax D. D. National Survey on Abandonment of Technology. Cooperative Agreement No. H133E80016. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington. DC 1992
   Google Scholar
• Picard M., LeFrancois J. Speech perception through FM auditory trainers in noise and reverberation. J Rehabil Res Dev 1986; 23: 53–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R., Duquesnoy A. J. Room acoustics for the aged. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1616–1621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack M. C. Hearing aids: needs and developments, Part 1. Hear Aid J 1977; 30(10)29–31
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt J. B. Assistive listening device versus conventional hearing aid in an elderly patient: case report. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 41–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed B. J., Fired J. H., Rhoades B. J. Empowerment and assistive technology: the local resource team model. J Rehabil 1995; 61: 30–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss M., Wacker R. R. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000; 66: 44–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York 1995, 4th edn.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers W. A., Carera E. F., Walker N., Gilbert D. K., Fish A. A survey of automatic teller machine usage across the adult life span. Human Factors 1996; 38: 156–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross M. FM large-area listening systems: description and comparison with other such systems. Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss: Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, M. Ross. York Press, Baltimore 1994; 51–69
   Google Scholar
• Ross M. When a hearing aid is not enough. Hear Rev 2000; 7: 26–30
   Google Scholar
• Ross M. Developments in research and technology. Hear Loss: J Self Help Hard Hear People 2001; 22: 34–36
   Google Scholar
• Sandridge S. A. Beyond hearing aids: use of auxiliary aids. Hearing Care for the Older Adult: Audiologic Rehabilitation, P. B. Kricos, S-A. Lesner. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1995; 127–166
   Google Scholar
• Sandridge S. A., Lesner S. A. Compatibility issues and interference. Adv Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol 2000; 10(5)13
   Google Scholar
• Schow R. L. Success of hearing aid fittings in nursing homes. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 173–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schow R. L., Nerbonne M. Hearing levels among elderly nursing home residents. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 45: 124–132
   Google Scholar
• Schum D. J. Clinical procedures for mating advanced technology hearing aids with FM systems. News from Oticon 1999, June.
   Google Scholar
• Schum D. J., Matthes L. J., Lee F. S. Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 636–642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stach B., Spretnjak M., Jerger J. The prevalence of central presbycusis in a clinical population. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 109–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stach B. A., Stoner W. R. Sensory aids for the hearing-impaired. Handbook of Geriatric Communication Disorders, D. Ripich. Pro-Ed, Austin. TX 1991; 421–438
   Google Scholar
• Surr R. K., Schuchman G. I., Montgomery A. A. Factors influencing use of hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 732–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewey B. P., Barniclc K., Perr A. The wrong stuff. Mainstream 1994; 19: 19–23
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeau L. Facilitating communication in nursing homes through the use of assistive listening devices. Nurs Homes Senior Citizen Care 1989; 38: 25–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thibodeau L. M., McCaffrey H., Abrahamson J. Effects of coupling hearing aids to FM systems via neck loops. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1988; 21: 49–56
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeau L., Schmidt L. A report on the condition of hearing aids in nursing homes and retirement centers. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1988; 21: 113–119
   Google Scholar
• Thomas D. Effectiveness of Smoke Detectors in Alerting People with Hearing Impairments, Thesis. University of Akron. 1994
   Google Scholar
• Turner E., Barrett C., Cutshall A., Lacy B. K., Keiningham J., . The user's perspective of assistive technology. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School. Work and Community, K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, J. M. Barcus, et al. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore 1995; 283–290
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Devices for Persons with Hearing Impairment, R. S. Tyler, D. J. Schum. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1995
   Google Scholar
• Voll L. M. Application of technology to improve signal-to-noise ratio. Semin Hear 2000; 21: 157–167
   Google Scholar
• Vonlanthen A. Hearing Instrument Technology for the Hearing Healthcare Professional. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 2000, 2nd edn.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock K. Ergonomics and automatic speech recognition applications for deaf and hard-of-hearing users. Technol Disabil 1997; 7: 147–164
   Google Scholar
• Wynne M. K. The shape of things to come and those that are here now. ASHA Leader 2001; 6(6–7)18
   Google Scholar