Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening: Potenciales auditivos evocados (ABR) por clicks a tasas altas de estimulación para la identificación de problemas auditivos en neonatos

References

• Aidan D, Avan P, Bonfils P. Auditory screening in neonates by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a report of 2,842 recordings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 525–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Task force on newborn and infant hearing. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 527–530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 28–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Brainstem and other responses in electric response audiometry. Ann Otol 1976; 85: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Allen A R, Starr A. Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 86: 186–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Salamy A. Maturational time course for the ABR in preterm and full term infants. Hear Res 1988; 33: 35–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysholdt U, Schreiner C. Maximum length sequences—a fast method for measuring brainstem evoked responses. Audiology 1982; 21: 242–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finkcnzeller P. Zeitgang-BERA zur Bcstimmung des Adapta-tionszeitganges des Ohres. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 51–52, Suppl II
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finkenzeller P. Zeitgang-BERA: Dcr schnelle Stufenreiz zur Schwellenbestimmung. Aktuelle phoniatrisch-pädaudiologische Aspekte 1994, M Gros. Renate Gros Verlag, Berlin 1994; 17–19
   Google Scholar
• Finkenzeller P. BERAphone—ABR screening. MilanItaly 2000, NHS 2000
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff P J. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerling U, Finitzo-Hieber T. Auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in normal and patient populations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 119–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Norton J S, Sininger Y S, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 400–433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamill T A, Hussung R A, Sammeth C A. Rapid threshold estimation using the ‘chained-stimuli’ technique for auditory brain stem response measurement. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 229–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkins S W, McEvoy Z M, Scott M L. Effect of stimulus interval on latency of the brainstem auditory evoked potential. Int J Neurosci 1979; 10: 7–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen T, Steinhoff H J, Böhnke F. Zum Entstehungs-mechanismus der Frequenzfolgepotentiale. Otorhinolaryngol Nova 1991; 1: 16–25
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention program. Am J Audiol 2000; 9: 9–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kok M R, van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P, Wallenburg H CS. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiology 1993; 32: 213–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasky R L. Rate and adaptation effects on the auditory evoked brainstem response in human newborns and adults. Hear Res 1997; 111: 165–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung S, Slaven A, Thornton A RD, Brickley G J. The use of high stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses in the estimation of hearing threshold. Hear Res 1998; 123: 201–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi H, Adelman C, Geal-Dor C, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns in the first 48 hours after birth. Audiology 1997; 36: 181–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Elcctrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W, Boucher B L, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütkenhöner B. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1991; 491: 52–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutman M E, Davis A C, Fortnum H M, Wood S. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 265–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia K V. Statistics of directional data. Academic Press, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Rosignoli M, Luciano R. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Audiology 1990; 29: 322–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxon A B, White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 149–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moushegian G, Ruoert A L, Stillman R D. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 665–667
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus statement: Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Public Health Service NIH Institutes, Office of Medical Applications of Research, Bethesda, MD 1993; Vol. 11: 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Paludetti G, Maurizi M, Ottaviani F. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR). Am J Otol 1983; 4: 226–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T W, Skinner C R, Champagne S C, Kellett A JC, Maiste A C. Potentials evoked by sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a lone. J Acousl Soc Am 1987; 82: 165–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Champagne S C, Kellett A JC. Human auditory evoked potentials recorded using maximum length sequences. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 90–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G, Stapedis D R, Picton T W. The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1991; 491: 153–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pratt H, Sohmer H. Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1976; 212: 85–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F W, Cohen L T, De Vidi S, Clark G M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorn K. The Munich screening programme in neonates. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 143–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E. Method for hearing screening of newborn by-means of steady-state responses evoked with high click rate. Patent Application 01610060.4, 2001, at the European Patent Office
   Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Wernecke K D. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiol Ncurootol 1999; 4: 211
   Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Pschirrer U. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology 2001; 40: 63–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton A RD, Slaven A. Auditory brainstem responses recorded at fast stimulation rates using maximum length sequences. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkin P M. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74: F16–F25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber B A, Roush P A. Use of maximum length sequence analysis in newborn hearing testing. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 187–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White K R, Vohr B R, Maxon A B, Behrens T R, McPherson M G, Mauk G W. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 203–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi T, Kaga K. The effect of click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979; 222: 91–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar