Stacked tone-burst-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR): preliminary findings: Respuestas auditivas del tallo cerebral (ABR) evocadas por bursts tonales acumulados: hallazgos preliminares

References

• Chandrasekhar S S, Brackmann D E, Devgan K. Utility of auditory brainstem response audiometry in diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 63–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses: effects of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann ORL Suppl 1976; 85: 1–96
   Google Scholar
• Davis H, Hirsh S K, Popelka G R, Formby C. Frequency selectivity and thresholds of brief stimuli suitable for electric response audiometry. Audiology 1984; 23: 59–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M, Eggermont J J. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acout Soc Am 1978; 63: 1084–1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Elberling C. Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2746–2757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Ponton C W, Eggermont J J, Masuda A. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 3476–3491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Masuda A, Nelson R, Brackmann D. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brain stem response amplitude. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 608–621
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrant J, Ferraro D. JA. Short-latency evoked potentials: electrocochleography & auditory brainstem response. Contemporary perspectives in hearing assessment, F Musiek, W Rintlemann. Allyn-Bacon, New York 1999; 197–242
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Don M. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1671–1675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C. Action potentials along the cochlear partition recorded from the ear canal in man. Scand Audiol 1974; 3: 13–19
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Hecox I CE. Clinical applications of the auditory brain stem response. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 709–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godey B, Morandi X, Beust L, Brassier G, Bourdinière J. Sensitivity of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma screening. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 501–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon M L, Cohen N L. Efficacy of auditory brainstem response as a screening test for small acoustic neuromas. Am J Otolaryngol 1995; 16: 136–139
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Thornton A R. The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 217–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabel J C, Zappulla R A, Ryder J, Wang W J, Malis L I. Brain stem auditory evoked responses in 56 patients with acoustic neurinoma. J Neurosurg 1991; 74: 749–753
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Mauldin L. Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brainstem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 456–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josey A F, Glasscock M E, Jackson C G. Preservation of hearing in acoustic tumor surgery: audiologie indicators. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97: 626–630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker D J, Thornton A R. Cochlear traveling wave velocities calculated from the derived components of nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978a; 7: 67–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker D J, Thornton A R. Frequency specific components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked human auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978b; 7: 53–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker D J, Thornton A R. The validity of the derived cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked response auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978c; 7: 45–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D R, Oates P. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 257–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman R D, Moushegian G, Rupert A L. Early tone-evoked responses in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology 1976; 15: 10–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teas D C, Eldrege D H, Davis H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: an interpretation of whole nerve action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1438–1459
   Google Scholar
• Telian S A, Kileny P R, Niparko J K, Kemink J L, Graham M D. Normal auditory brainstem response in patients with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 10–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner R G, Shepard N T, Frazer G J. Clinical performance of audiological and related diagnostic tests. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Drift J F, Brocaar M P, van Zanlen G A. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1987; 26: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss M H, Kisiel D L, Bhatia P. Predictive value of brainstem evoked response in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103: 583–585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson D F, Hodgson R S, Gustafson M F, Hogue S, Mills L. The sensitivity of auditory brain stem response testing in small acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 961–964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson D F, Talbot J, Mills L. A clinical appraisal of the role of auditory brain stem response and magnetic resonance imaging in acoustic neuroma diagnosis. Am J Otol 1997; 8: 673–681
   Google Scholar
• Yamada O, Kodera K, Yagi T. Cochlear processes affecting wave V latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 67–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar