Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. On-line gain control in a digital hearing aid: Utilizatión de un modelo de intensidad para la adaptación de auxiliares auditivos. V. Control de ganancia en línea en un auxiliar auditivo

References

• Aibara R., Welsh J. T., Puria S., Goode R. L. Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance. Hear Res 2001; 152: 100–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J. B., Jeng P S. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB); a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 745–753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI, New York 1997, ANSI S3.5–1997
   Google Scholar
• Appell J. E. Loudness models for rehabilitative audiology. PhD thesis, Oldenburg University. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B. C.J. Evaluation of a scheme to compensate for reduced frequency selectivity in hearing-impaired subjects. Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss., W. Jesteadt. Erlbaum, New Jersey 1997; 329–341
   Google Scholar
• Brand T. Analysis and optimization of psychophysical procedures in audiology. PhD thesis, University of Oldenburg. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg K., Stoll G. ISO-MPEG-1 Audio: a generic standard for coding of high-quality digital audio. J Audio Eng Soc 1994; 42: 780–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buus S., Florentine M. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002; 3: 120–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buus S., Florentine M., Poulsen T. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 3464–3480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buus S., Müsch H., Florentine M. On loudness at threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 399–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection. The IHAFF approach. Hear J 1995; 48(10)39–44
   Google Scholar
• Dillier N., Fröhlich T., Kompis M., Bogli H., Lai W. K. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants. J Rehab Res Dev 1993; 30: 95–109
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times?. Ear Hear. 1996; 17: 287–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C. Loudness scaling revisited. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 248–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine M., Zwicker E. A model of loudness summation applied to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1979; 1: 121–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B. R., Moore B. C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B. R., Moore B. C.J. A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. J Audio Eng Soc 2002; 50: 331–342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D. D. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33: 1344–1356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D. D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. J Aeoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592–2605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann V. Dynamikkompression für Hörgeräte —Psychoakustische Grundlagen und Algorithmen. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1993
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann V., Kollmeier B. Perceptual models for hearing aid algorithms. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids., B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1996; 193–202
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J. Scaling methods for the selection, fitting and evaluation of hearing aids. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids., B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1997; 297–306
   Google Scholar
• Killion M. C. Hearing aids: past, present and future: moving toward normal conversations in noise. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 141–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M. C., Fikret-Pasa S. Three types of sensorineural hearing loss: loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hear J 1993; 46: 31–36
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Hohmann V. Loudness estimation and compensation employing a categorical scale. Advances in Hearing Research., G. A. Manley, G. M. Klump, C. Köppl, H. Fasti, H. Oeckinghaus. World Scientific, Singapore 1995; 441–451
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Peissig J., Hohmann V. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids. J Rehab Res Dev 1993; 30: 82–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launer S. Loudness perception in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. PhD thesis, University of Oldenburg. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Launer S., Hohmann V., Kollmeier B. Modeling loudness growth and loudness summation in hearing-impaired listeners. Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss., W. Jesteadt. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey 1997; 175–185
   Google Scholar
• Leijon A. Optimization of hearing-aid gain and frequency response for cochlear hearing losses. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden 1989
   Google Scholar
• Leijon A. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution. Ear Hear 1990; 12: 242–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol 1986; 139–152, Suppl, 25
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Frequency analysis and masking. Hearing., B. C.J. Moore. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida 1995a; 161–205
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995b
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 4th edn. Academic, San Diego 1997
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore ‘normal’ loudness for speech at different levels. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 165–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Alcántara J. I., Marriage J. E. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. Br J Audiol 2001a; 35: 339–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R., Stone M. A. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999a; 33: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R., Vickers D. A. Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1999b; 106: 898–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Launer S., Vickers D., Baer T. Loudness of modulated sounds as a function of modulation rate, modulation depth, modulation waveform and overall level. Psycho physical and Physiological Advances in Hearing., A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summerfield, R. Meddis. Whurr, London 1998; 465–471
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Stone M. A., Alcántara J. I. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001b; 35: 307–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Vickers D. A., Baer T., Launer S. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1999c; 105: 2757–2772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Vickers D. A., Plack C. J., Oxenham A. J. Interrelationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am 1999d; 106: 2761–2778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Wojtczak M., Vickers D. A. Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 481–489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsons K. S., Bennett R. L., Fidell S. Speech Levels in Various Environments. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1976, Report No. 3281
   Google Scholar
• Pluvinage V. Clinical measurement of loudness growth. Hear Inst 1989; 39: 28–29; 32
   Google Scholar
• Puria S., Rosowski J. J., Peake W. T. Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 2754–2770
   Google Scholar
• Recio A., Rich N. C., Narayan S. S., Ruggero M. A. Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1972–1989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M. A., Rich N. C. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 1057–1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf B. Critical bands. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory., J. V. Tobias. Academic Press, New York 1970; 157–202
   Google Scholar
• Scharf B. Loudness. Handbook of Perception, Vol. IV Hearing., E. C. Carterette, M. P. Friedman. Academic Press, New York 1978; 187–242
   Google Scholar
• Shaw E. A.G. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 1848–1861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1937; 9: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C.J., Alcántara J. I., Glasberg B. R. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 3603–3619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villehur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1646–1657
   Google Scholar
• Yates G. K. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions. Hear Res 1990; 50: 145–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates G. K. Cochlear structure and function. Hearing., B. C.J. Moore. Academic Press, San Diego 1995; 41–73
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33: 248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Scharf B. A model of loudness summation. Psych Rev 1965; 72: 3–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar