References
- Brown C. J., Abbas P. J., Bertschy M., Tyler R. S., Lowder M., et al. Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 439–449
- Butts S. L., Hodges A. V., Dolan-Ash S., Balkany T. J. Changes in stimulation levels over time in Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users. Seventh symposium on cochlear implants in children, G. J. Gantz, R. S. Tyler, J. T. Rubinstein, 2000; 109: 53–56, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (12, suppl 185)
- Clark G. M., Shepherd R. K., Franz B. K., Dowell R. C., Tong Y. C., et al. The histopathology of the human temporal bone and auditory central nervous system following cochlear implantation in a patient: correlation with psychophysics and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1988; 448: 12–17
- Dorman M. F., Smith L. M., Dankowski K., McCandless G., Parkin J. L. Long term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds in the Ineraid cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35: 1126–1130
- Geier L. L., Norton S. J. The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception. Ear Hear 1992; 13(5)340–348
- Hughes M. L., Vander Werff K. R., Brown C. J., Abbas P. J., Kelsay D. M.R., et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 471–486
- Hughes M. L., Brown C. J., Abbas P. J., Wolaver A. A., Gervais J. P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear 2000; 21(2)164–174
- Kawano A., Seldon H. L., Clark G. M., Ramsden R. T., Raine C. H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 313–326
- Kubo X., Iwaki X., Ohkusa M., Doi K., Uno A., et al. Auditory plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 224–227
- Pfingst B. E. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1990; 50: 225–236
- Roberts S. Speech processor fitting for cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants: a Practical Guide., H. Cooper. Whurr Publishing Ltd, London 1991; 201–218
- Shapiro W., Walzman S. Changes in electrical thresholds over time in young children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear prosthesis. International cochlear implant, speech and hearing symposium—Melbourne, G. M. Clark, R. S.C. Cowan, 1995; 104: 177–178, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (suppl 166).
- Shiroma M., Honda K., Yamanaka N., Kawano J., Yukawa K., et al. Factors contributing to phoneme recognition ability of users of the 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 32–37
- Skinner M. W., Binzer S. M., Holden L. K., Holden T. A. Hearing changes in adults with cochlear implants. Semin Hear 1995; 16(3)228–239
- Skinner M. W., Holden L. K., Holden T. A. Parameters selection to optimize speech recognition with the Nucleus implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 188–195
- Sun J. C., Skinner M. W., Liu S. Y., Huang S. T. Effect of speech processor program modifications on cochlear implant recipients' threshold and maximum acceptable loudness levels. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 128–136
- Swanson B., Seligman P., Carter P. Impedance measurement of the nucleus 22-electrode array in patients. International cochlear implant, speech and hearing symposium—Melbourne, G. M. Clark, R. S.C. Cowan, 1995; 104: 141–144, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (suppl 166)
- Xu J., Shepherd R. K., Millard R. E., Clark G. M. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hear Res 1997; 105: 1–29