Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Confiabilidad inmediata y a corto plazo de las emisiones otoacústicas por productos de distorsión

References

• American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1985
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi A. Psychological Testing. MacMillan, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. Technical aspects on stimulation, recording and signal processing. Scand Audiol Suppl 1981; 13: 41–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R. C., Bleech J. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 305–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R. C., Jones R. L. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects. Audiology 1998; 37: 187–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R. C., Ireland A. Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol. 2000; 29: 93–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J. R. The truth about scores children achieve on tests. Lang Speech Hear Services Schools 1989; 20: 366–371
   Google Scholar
• Brown A. M., Sheppard S. L., Russell P. T. Acoustic distortion products (ADP) from the ears of term infants and young adults using low stimulus levels. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 273–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A. T., McClelland W. A., Weiner J., McFarland D. J. Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 1138–1148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demorest M. E. Psychometric issues in speech recognition testing. ASHA Rep 1984; 14: 19–22
   Google Scholar
• Demorest M. E., Walden B. E. Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49: 226–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin D. J., McCoy M. J., Martin G. K., Lonsbury-Martin B. L. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 417–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill S. A., Brown A. M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2fl-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselli E. E., Campbell J. P, Zedeck S. Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. WH Freeman, San Francisco 1981
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M. P., Neely S. T., Dorn P A. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance on a priori criteria and for raultifrequency audiometric standards. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 345–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grason Stadler. Grason-Stadler GSI 60 DPOAE—Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions System User Manual. GSI Grason-Stadler, Milford, NH 1996
   Google Scholar
• Guilford J. P., Fruchter B. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. McGraw-Hill, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Hall J. W. Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Harris F. P., Lonsbury-Martin B. L., Stagner B. B., Coats A. C., Martin G. K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter M. F., Kimm L., Cafarlli D. D., Kennedy C. R., Thornton A. R. Feasibility of otoacoustic emission detection followed by ABR as universal neonatal screening test for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 41–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde M. L. Instrumentation and signal processing. The Auditory Brainstem Response, J. T. Jacobson. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1985; 33–48
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics. Standard Reference Zero for the Calibration of Pure Tone Air Conduction Audiometers. ISO, Geneva 1994; 389
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D. T. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 224: 37–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D. T, Bray P., Alexander L., Brown A. M. Acoustic emission cochleography—practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 15: 71–96
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly B. P, Brown D. K., Allen J. B. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Otoacoustic Emissions, M. S. Robinette, T. J Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 181–204
   Google Scholar
• Lafreniere D., Jung M. D., Smurzynski J., Leonard G., Kim D. O. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns. Arch Otolaryngol 1991; 117: 1382–1389
   Google Scholar
• Lemke E., Wiersma W. Principles of Psychological Measurement. Rand McNally, Chicago 1976
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B., McCoy M., Whitehead M., Martin G. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Heller L. M. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 237–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrens W. A., Lehmann I. J. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Mulheran M., Degg C. Comparison of distortion product OAE generation between a patient group requiring frequent gentamicin therapy and control subjects. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 5–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F. E., Baran J. A. Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 370–374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F. E., Baran J. A. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: hit and false-positive rates in normal hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 454–461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen L. H., Popelka G. R., Rasmussen A. N., Osterhammel P A. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 159–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter J. Basic instrumentation issues in acquiring distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic Emissions, M. S. Robinette, T. J. Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 333–346
   Google Scholar
• Painter J. Grason Stadler Incorporated (GSI). Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions, J. W. Hall. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 2000; 291–303
   Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Linden R. D., Hamel G., Maru J. T. Aspects of averaging. Semin Hear 1983; 4: 327–340
   Google Scholar
• Popelka G. R., Karzon R. K., Clary R. A. Identification of noise sources that influence distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in human neonates. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 319–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B. A., Gorga M. P, Schmidt A., Neely S., Peters J. Analysis of transient-evoked emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R., Harris F. P, Hauser R. Clinical monitoring using otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 85–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen A. N., Popelka G. R., Osterhammel P. A., Nielsen L. H. Clinical significance of relative probe levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 223–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roede X, Harris F. P, Probst R., Xu L. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1993; 32: 273–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stover, L., Gorga, M.P., Neely, S.T. Montoya, D. 1996. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am. 100,956967.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M.L.. McCoy, M.l, Lonsbury-Martin. B.L. Martin, O.K. 1995. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below Ll. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2346 2358.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley. M.P., Davies. C.M. Stevens. lC. 1998. Use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to detect and monitor cochlear damage caused by platinum-containing drugs. Br J Audiol, 32. 306-316.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. Stephens. D. 1999. Test-retest variability of distortionproduct otoacoustic emissions in human ears with normal hearing. Scond Audiol. 28,171 178
   Google Scholar