A comparison of three approaches to verifying aided Baha output

References

• American Academy of Audiology. 2003. Pediatric Amplification Protocol. J Am Acad of Audiol. Accessed from http://www.audiology.org/NR/rdonlyres/53D26792-E321-41AF-850F-CC253310F9DB/0/pedamp.pdf, August 20, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specification for audiometers. ANSI S3.6-1996. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA. 1998. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults: Asha ad hoc committee on hearing aid selection and fitting. Am J of Audiol, 7(1), 5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caldwell, M., Souza, P.E. & Tremblay, K.L. 2006. Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech. Trends Amplifi, 10(3), 145–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cole, W.A. 2005. The Audioscan Speechmap® Fitting System. Audionote 1, Accessed from http://www.audioscan.com/resources/audionotes/audionote1lowrez.pdf, August 20, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C. & Gilmore, C.A. 1987. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear, 8(Suppl): 119S–126S.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 1990. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification. Ear Hear, 11(1), 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. 1991. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday environments. Ear Hear, 12(2), 123–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elpern, B. & Naunton, R. 1963. The stability of the occlusion effect. Arch Otolaryngol, 77, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Erber, N.P. 1973. Body baffle and real-ear effects in the selection of hearing aids for children with deafness. J Speech Hear Disord, 38, 224–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gengel, R. W., Pascoe, D.P. & Shore, I. 1971. A frequency response procedure for evaluating and selecting hearing aids for severely hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Disord, 36, 341–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Håkansson, B.E.V. 2003. The balanced electromagnetic separation transducer a new bone conduction transducer. J Acoust Soc Am, 113(2), 818–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.B. 1980. Loudness discomfort levels. A clinical procedure for hearing aid evaluations. J Speech Hear Disord, 1, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.B., Montgomery, A.A. & Prosek, R.A. 1987. Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measures. J Speech Hear Res, 52, 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.B. 2004. Limitations and uses of the aided audiogram, Semin Hear, 25, 51.
   Google Scholar
• Huizing, E.H. 1960. Bone conduction: The influence of the middle ear. Acta Otolaryngol, 155, 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, D. & Ling, A. 1978. Aural Habilitation. Washington, DC: A.G. Bell.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, J. & Frazer, G. 1980. An investigation into the variables affecting aided threshold. Aus J Audiol, 2, 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, K.S., Seewlad, R.C. & Sinclair, S.T. 1994. Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. J Am Acad Audiol, 3(1), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.E., Wilson, R.H. & Dirks, D.D. 1974. Loudness discomfort level: Selected methods and stimuli, J Acoust Soc Am, 56, 577–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, W., Hawkins, D. & van Tassel, D. 1987. Representations of the long-term spectra of speech. Ear Hear, 8(Suppl 5), 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinfeldt, S., Stenfelt, S., Good, T. & Håkansson, B.E.V. 2007. Examination of bone-conducted transmission from sound field excitation measured by thresholds, ear-canal sound pressure, and skull vibrations. J Acoust Soc Am, 121(3), 1576–1587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R.C., Cornelisse, L.E. & Jenstad, L.M. 1999. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms. Ear Hear, 19(5), 407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D. & Seewald, R.C. 2002. Electroacoustic verification measures with modern hearing instrument technology. In: R.C. Seewald & J.S. Gravel (eds.) A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification 2001: Proceedings of the Second International Conference. Stafa Switzerland: Phonak AG. 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie, S. D. & Seewald, R. C. 2002. Hearing aid fitting and verification procedures for children. In: J. Katz (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 687–706.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald, R. C., Hudson, S. P., Gagne, J. P. & Zelisko, D. L. 1992. Comparison of two methods for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech. Ear Hear, 13(3), 142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald, R. C., Moodie, K. S., Sinclair, S. T. & Cornelisse, L. E. 1996. Traditional and theoretical approaches to selecting amplification for infants and young children. In: F. H. Bess, J. S. Gravel & A. M. Tharpe (eds.), Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Press, 161–191.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P. G. & Lewis, D. E. 1988. Some theoretical considerations concerning the relation between functional gain and insertion gain. J Speech Hear Res, 31(3), 491–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P. G., Hoover, B., Lewis, D. E. & Brennan, M. 2002. Is functional gain really functional? Hear J, 55(11), 38.
   Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. & Goode, R. L. 2005a. Bone-conducted sound: Physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol, 26, 1245–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. & Håkansson, B.E.V. 2002. Air vs. bone conduction: An equal loudness investigation. Hear Res, 167(12), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondorff, J. 1966. Bone conduction: Studies in experimental animals. Acta Otolaryngol, 213, 1–132.
   Google Scholar
• Traynor, R.M. 2000. Prescriptive Procedures: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service: Practical Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting. Baltimore, MD: Department of Veterans Affairs.
   Google Scholar