A multi-site evaluation of a proposed test for verifying hearing aid maximum output

References

• American Academy of Audiology. Guidelines for audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. 2005. Audiology Today, 18:(5), 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. 1998. ASHA. 40:(Suppl 18).
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, R.C., Huynh, R.C., Ngo, V.N., Jones, R.L. 1997. IHAFF loudness contour test: reliability and effects of approach mode in normal-hearing subjects. J Am Acad Audiol, 8:243–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Pavlovic, C.V. 1989. Comparison of discomfort levels obtained with pure tones and multitone complexes. J Acoust Soc Am, 86:126–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, R.A., Pavlovic, & C.V. Abbas, P.J. 1990. A signal processing scheme for output limitation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 469:230–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler, R.A., Nelson, J.A. 2001. Effect of spectral shaping and content on loudness discomfort. J Am Acad Audiol, 12:462–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertoli, S, Staehelin, K., Zemp, E., Schindler, C., Bodner, D., . 2009. Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol, 48:183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, S.P., Musiek, F.E. 1993. Loudness discomfort level and reliability as a function of instructional set. Scand Audiol, 22:125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch, S., Michels, L., Mauz, P.S., de Maddalena, H., Löwenheim, H. 2005. Factors influencing rehabilitation of sensorineural hearing loss with hearing aids. HNO, 53:(2) 142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton-Conley, C.L., Neuman, A.C., Killion, M.C., Levitt, H. 2004. Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. J Am Acad Audiol, 15:440–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, R. 1983. Using ULCL measures to fit gain and SSPL90. Hear Instr, 34:17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C. 1995. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16:176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52:10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. . 2001. Hearing Aids. Boomerang Press271–274.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., Storey, L. 1998. The National Acoustic Laboratories’ procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: theoretical derivation. Ear Hear, 19:255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J., . 1967.The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, J.M. 1993. Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. J Acoust Soc Am, 93:2753–2763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P.R., Margolis, R.H. 1992. Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort. J Am Acad Audiol, 3:193–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine, M. (2008). Binaural loudness summation in and out of the laboratory. Presentation at the Acoustics 2008 Paris Conference, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, T.W., Preves, D.A. 1994. Acoustic and hearing aid circuit variables affecting the tolerability of aided impulsive-type sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 5:307–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortune, T., Scheller, T. 2000. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level. Ear Hear, 21:329–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Harvey, A. 1985. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res, 28:445–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins, D. 1980. The effect of signal type on the loudness discomfort level. Ear Hear, 1:38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. 1984. Selection of a critical electroacoustic characteristic: SSPL90. Hear Instr, 35:(11) 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D., Walden, B., Montgomery, A., Prosek, R. . 1987a.Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear; 8:(3) 162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.B., Prosek, R.A., Walden, B.E., Montgomery, A. 1987b. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res; 30:37–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Job, R.F.S. 1988. Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. J Acoust Soc Am, 83:991–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm, C., Dirks, D., Mickey, M.R. 1978. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. J Speech Hear Res, 21:668–681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawai, K., Yano, T. 2002. Relation between the overall impression o the sound environment and types and loudness of environmental sounds. J Sound Vibration, 250:41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., Grant, F. 2001. The preferred number of channels (one, two, or four) in NAL-NL1 prescribed wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) devices. Ear Hear, 22:516–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., O’Brien, A., Latzel, M., Convery, E. 2007. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction algorithm. Hear J, 60, 29, 32, 34:38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., Convery, E., Kiessling, J., Bentler, R. Is the hearing instrument to blame when the environment gets really noisy?. Hear Rev. 16:12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling, J., Keidser, G., Bentler, R., Mueller, M. 2009. The Output Verification Test—a step towards a tool to clinically verify the output of hearing instruments. Hear Rev, 16:(4) 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, B.C. 2005.The influene of presentation method on auditory length perceptionIn. Heft, H., Marsh, K.L. Studies in Perception and Action VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,145–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, D. 2001. Most dispensers in Journal's survey report greater patient satisfaction with digitals. Hear J, 54:(3) 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2005. MarkeTrak VII: customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J, 58:(9) 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2007. MarkeTrak VII: obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aids. Hear J,, 60:(4) 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mershon, D.H., Desaulniers, D.H., Kiefer, S.A., Amerson, T.L. Jr., Mills, J.T. 1981. Perceived loudness and visually-determined auditory distance. Perception, 10:531–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, G.H. 2003. Fitting test protocols are ‘more honored in the breach than the observance’. Hear J, 56:(10) 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Ghent, R.M., Bray, V., Harris, V. 2005. Development of a test environment to evaluate performance of modern hearing aid featues. J Am Acad Audiol, 16:27–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascoe, D., 1988. Clinical measurements of the auditory dynamic range and their relation to formula for hearing aid gainIn: Jensen, J, Hearing Aid Fitting: Theoretical and Practical Views. Proceedings of the 13th Danavox SymposiumCopenhagen: Danavox, 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J.P., Wilson, R.H. 1988. Detection, loudness, and discrimination of five-component tonal complexes differing in crest factor. J Acoust Soc Am, 84:166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, J.L., Robb, R., 1992. Prescriptive hearing aid fitting by parameter adjustment and selection. J Am Acad Audiol, 3:94–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Punch, J.L., Robb, R., Shovels, A.H. 1994. Aided listener preferences in laboratory versus real-world environments. Ear Hear, 15:50–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revitt, L.J. . Toward accurate assessment of real-world hearing aid benefit. Hear Rev. August2002; :34–51.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M.W., Miller, J., Kwiecinki, J., Matsomoto, H. 1983Loudness summation in normal and hearing impaired listeners. C.I.D. Periodic Progress Report. No 26,39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, S.D. 1969. Auditory threshold variance, signal detection theory and personality. Int Audiol, 8:131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorialho, A., Sorri, M., Nuojua, I., Muhli, A. 2006. Changes in hearing aid use over the past 20 years. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 263:(4) 355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, R.L., Bentler, R.A. 2002. Thresholds of discomfort for complex stimuli: acoustic and sound-quality predictors. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45:1016–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.L.N., Hickson, L., McPherson, B. 2003. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?. Trends Ampl, 7:(4) 117–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar