581
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants

, , , , &
Pages 44-53 | Received 08 Apr 2009, Accepted 21 Jul 2009, Published online: 07 Jan 2010

References

  • Anderson K.L., Goldstein H., Colodzin L., Inglehart F. 2005. Benefit of S/N enhancing devices to speech perception of children listening in a typical classroom with hearing aids or a cochlear implant. J Educ Audiol, 12, 14–28.
  • Boothroyd A. 2004. Hearing aid accessories for adults: The remote FM microphone. Ear Hear, 25, 22–33.
  • Chisholm T.H., Noe C.M., McArdle R., Abrams H. 2007. Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: The role of the FM system. Trends in Amplif, 11, 73–89.
  • Davies M.G., Yellon L., Purdy S.C. 2001. Speech-in-noise perception of children using cochlear implants and FM systems. Aust NZ J Audiol, 23, 52–62.
  • Dorman M.F., Loizou P.C., Fitzke J. 1998. The identification of speech in noise by cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing listeners using six-channel signal processors. Ear Hear, 19, 481–484.
  • Flexer C. 2004. Classroom amplification systems. R.J. Roeser, M.P. Downs Auditory Disorders in School Children. New York: Thieme, 284–305.
  • Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., Wang X. 2001. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1150–1163.
  • Jerger J., Chmiel R., Florin E., Pirozzolo F., Wilson N. 1996. Comparison of conventional amplification and an assistive listening device in elderly persons. Ear Hear, 17, 490–504.
  • Lewis M.S., Valente M., Horn J.E., Crandell C.C. 2005. The effects of hearing aids and frequency modulation technology on results from the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 250–261.
  • Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
  • Schafer E.C., Thibodeau L.M. 2004. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 678–691.
  • Schafer E.C., Thibodeau L.M. 2006. Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements. Am J Audiol, 15, 114–126.
  • Schafer E.C., Wolfe J., Lawless T., Stout B. 2009. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol,48, 196–203.
  • SPSS 2007. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 16.0. 2007. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
  • Strauss A., Corbin J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
  • Wolfe J., Schafer J. 2008. Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 585–594.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.