Masking effects of speech and music: Does the masker's hierarchical structure matter?

References

• Alain C., Woods D.L. 1993. Distractor clustering enhances detection speed and accuracy during selective listening. Percept Psychophys, 54, 509–514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 2004. ANSI-S3.6-2004, Specifications for Audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Babbitt M. 1960. Twelve-tone invariants as compositional determinants. The Music Quarterly, 46, 246–259.
   Google Scholar
• Besson M., Schön D. 2001. Comparison between language and music. RJ. Zatorre, I. Peretz. The Biological Foundations of Music. New York, The New York Academy of Sciences, 232–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bharacha J.J., Todd P. 1989. Modeling the perception of tonal structures with neural nets. Computer Music Journal, 13, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher V.J. 2006. On the function of stress rhythms in speech: Evidence of a link with grouping effects on serial memory. Lang Speech, 49, 495–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower G.H., Springston F. 1970. Pauses as recoding points in letter series. J Exp Psychol, 83, 421–430.
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A.S. 1978. Auditory streaming is cumulative. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform, 4, 380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman A.S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A.S., Rudnicky A. 1975. Auditory segregation: Stream or streams? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percep Perform, 1, 263–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart D.S. 2001. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 1101–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyon R.P. 2004. How the brain separates sounds. Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalikia M.H., Bregman A.S. 1989. The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation. Percept Psychophys, 46, 487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M.Y. 1983. Toward a grammar of singing: Tune-text association in Gregorian chant. Music Perception, 1, 84–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A. Mehler J., Norris D., Segui J. 1986. The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapretto M., Bookheimer S.Y. 1999. Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24, 427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch D. 1980. The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Percept Psychophys, 28, 381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch D. 1999. Grouping mechanisms in music. D.Deutsch. The Psychology of Music. San Diego: Academic Press, 299–348.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling W.J., Tillman B., Ayers D. 2002. Memory and the experience of hearing music. Music Perception, 19, 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresher B.A. 1996. Introduction to metrical and prosodic phonology. J.L. Morgan, K. Demuth. Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Durlach N.I., Mason C.R., Kidd G.Jr., Arbogast T.L., Colburn H.S. . 2003. Note on informational masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 2984–2987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor J.D. 1997. Learning to parse? J Psycholinguist Res, 27, 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry D.B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J Acoust Soc Am, 35, 415–479.
   Google Scholar
• Gallun F.J., Mason C.R., Kidd G.Jr. 2007. Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli. Percept Psychophys, 69, 757–771.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garner W.A. 1974. The Processing of Information and Structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Hickey S., Moore R.E. 2007. Influence of music and music preference on acceptable noise level in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 417–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe E., Low E. 2002. Durational variability in speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis. C. Gussenhoven, N. Warner. Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 515–546.
   Google Scholar
• Grant K.W., Summers V., Leek M.R. 1998. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S., Carvey, H., Hitchcock, L., Chang, S. (2003). Temporal properties of spontaneous speech - a syllable-centric perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean F. 1983. How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 21, 501–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean F., Hirt C. 1996. Using prosody to predict the end of sentences in English and French: Normal and brain-damaged subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 107–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R., Makela J.P. 1988. Modification of neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex by masking sounds. Exp Brain Res, 71, 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1969. IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measures. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoustics, 17, 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• James B., Dean J. 2002. Jazz. The Oxford Companion to Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 627–631.
   Google Scholar
• Jones M.R. 1976. Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Rev, 83, 323–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M.R., Boltz M. 1989. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol Rev, 96, 459–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M.R., Kidd G. Jr., Wetzel R. 1981. Evidence for rhythmic attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 7, 1059–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd G. Jr., Mason C.R., Arbogast T.L. 2002. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1367–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd G. Jr., Mason C.R., Deliwala P.S., Woods W.S., Colburn H.S. 1994. Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 3475–3480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl C.L., Sandell G.J., Sergeant D.C. 1987. The perception of tone hierarchies in twelve-tone serial music. Music Perception, 5, 31–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham A. 2002. Metre. The Oxford Companion to Music (). New York: Oxford University Press. 769.
   Google Scholar
• Lerdahl F. 2001. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerdahl F., Jackendoff R. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin D.J., Menon V. 2003. Musical structure is processed in ‘language’ areas of the brain: A possible role for Brodmann Area 47 in temporal coherence. Neuroimage, 20, 2142–2152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L. 2003. Talker separation and sequential stream segregation in listeners with hearing loss: Patterns associated with talker gender. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 46, 912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maess B., Koelsch S., Gunter T.C., Friederici A.D. 2001. Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis E.H. 2005. A model of melodic expectation. Music Perception, 22, 663–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews M.V., Pierce J.R. 1980. Harmony and nonharmonic partials. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 1252–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys S., White L., Melhorn J.F. 2005. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. J Exp Psychol, 134, 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Narmour E. 1999. Hierarchical expectation and musical style. D. Deutsch. The Psychology of Music. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 441–472.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. 1993. Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Fligor B., Mason C.R., Kidd G. Jr. 2003. Informational masking and musical training. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 1543–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A.D. 2003. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A.D., Gibson E., Ratner J., Besson M., Holcomb P.J. 1998. Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. J Cogn Neurosci, 10, 717–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A.D., Iversen J.R., Rosenberg J.C. 2006. Comparing the rhythm and melody of speech and music: The case of British English and French. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 3034–3047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platel H., Price C., Baron J-C., Wise R., Lambert J. . 1997. The structural components of music perception: A functional anatomical study. Brain, 120, 229–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz J.R., Lockhead G.R. 1991. Perception of structure: An overview. G.R. Lockhead, J.R. Pomerantz. The Perception of Structure. Washington, DC: APA Books, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin-Charronnat B., Bigand E., Koelsch S. 2006. Processing of musical syntax tonic versus subdominant: An event-related potential study. J Cog Neurosci, 18, 1545–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressing J. 2002. Black Atlantic rhythm: Its computational and transcultural foundations. Music Perception, 19, 285–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J., Dreschler W.A. 2005. Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1274–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J., Dreschler W.A. 2008. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 29, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers W.L., Bregman A.S. 1993. An experimental evaluation of three theories of auditory stream segregation. Percept Psychophys, 53, 179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo F.A., Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2008. Tune in or tune out: Age-related differences in listening to speech in music. Ear Hear, 29, 746–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes P., Temperley N., Nagley J. 2002. Scales. The Oxford Companion to Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 1105–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiro B., Gyri B. 2007. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, EL229–EL235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L-F. 2009. Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners’ recognition of English words in competing signals. Int J Audiol, 48, 260–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich K.E., West R.F. 1983. On priming by a sentence context. J Exp Psychol Gen, 112, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedman M.J. 1984. A generative grammar for jazz chord sequences. Music Perception, 2, 52–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A. 1985. A “rationalized” arsine transform. J Sp Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., Carhart, R. (1966). An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann B., Janata P., Birk J., Bharucha J.J. 2008. Tonal centers and expectancy: Facilitation or inhibition of chords at the top of the harmonic hierarchy? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 34, 1031–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaneva L. 2003. Masking effect of music upon oral information processing. Central European Journal of Public Health, 11, 173–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Noorden L.P. 1975. Temporal coherence in the perception of tonal sequences. Ph. D. Thesis, Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vuust P., Roepstorff A., Wallentin M., Mouridsen K., Østergaard L. 2006. It don't mean a thing... Keeping the rhythm during polyrhyfhmic tension, activates language areas (BA47). Neuroimage, 31, 832–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittall A. 2002. Rhythm. The Oxford Companion to Music. New York: Oxford University Press. 1055–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic boundaries. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1707–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D.L., Alain C. 1993. Feature processing during high-rate auditory selective attention. Percept Psychophys, 53, 391–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zatorre R.J., Belin P., Penhune V.B. 2002. Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends Cogn Sci, 6, 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatorre R.J., Meyer E., Gjedde A., Evans A.C. 1996. PET studies of phonetic processes in speech perception: Review, replication, and reanalysis. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. 1976. On Milton Babbitt's String Quartet No. 2. Perspectives of New Music, 14, 85–110.
   Google Scholar