The effects of a second stimulus on the auditory steady state response (ASSR) from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla

References

• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y. . 1994. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-kHz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Oto-Laryngologica Supplement, 511, 7–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold S., Burkard R. 2000. Studies of interaural attenuation to investigate the validity of a dichotic difference tone response recorded from the inferior colliculus in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1541–1547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold S., Burkard R. 2002. Inner hair cell loss and steady-state potentials from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 590–599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein L.R. 1994. Comments on ‘The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones’ [J Acoust Soc Am 94, 3215–3226 (1993)]. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 1189–1190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brantberg K., Fransson P.A., Hansson H., Rosenhall U. 1999. Measures of the binaural interaction component in human auditory brainstem response using objective detection criteria. Scand Audiol, 28, 15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G., Ming W.J. 2002. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 173–187; quiz 225–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Debruyne F. 1984. Binaural interaction in early, middle, and late auditory evoked responses. Scand Audiol, 13, 293–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., Ross, B. 2008. Neural generators of the auditory steady-state response. G. Rance. Auditory Steady-State Response: Generation, Recording, and Clinical Applications. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W.F. 1997. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli. Hear Res, 110, 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolphin W.F., Chertoff M.E., Burkard R. 1994. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2225–2234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin W.F., Mountain D.C. 1993. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 3215–3226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draganova R., Ross B., Wollbrink A., Pantev C. 2008. Cortical steady-state responses to central and peripheral auditory beats. Cereb Cortex, 18, 1193–1200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritze W. 1985. On binaural beats. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 242, 301–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S. 1992. Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-kHz steady-state response. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 2683–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallun F.J., Mason C.R., Kidd G. Jr. 2007. The ability to listen with independent ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 2814–2825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths S.K., Chambers R.D. 1991. The amplitude modulation-following response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear, 12, 235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K.R. 1999. Noise improves transfer of near-threshold, phase-locked activity of the cochlear nerve: Evidence for stochastic resonance? J Comp Physiology A-Sens Neuroal Behav Physiol, 184, 577–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. 2001. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol, 30, 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hink R.F., Kodera K., Yamada O., Kaga K., Suzuki J. 1980. Binaural interaction of a beating frequency-following response. Audiology, 19, 36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L., Picton T.W. 1998. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Picton T.W. 2000. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computer Methods Programs in Biomed, 61, 125–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. 2002. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell, D.W. 2008. Introduction to technical principles of auditory steady-state response testing. G. Rance. The Auditory Steady-State Response: Generation, Recording, and Clinical Application. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A., Danesh A.A. 2008. Air-conduction auditory steady-state response: comparison of interchannel recording using two modulation frequencies. J Am Acad Audiology, 19, 696–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karino S., Yumoto M., Itoh K., Uno A., Yamakawa K. . 2006. Neuromagnetic responses to binaural beat in human cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol, 96, 1927–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T. 1995. The middle latency response generating system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, 44, 93–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan A., McDaniel S.S. 1998. Binaural interaction in the human frequency-following response: Effects of interaural intensity difference. Audiol Neurootol, 3, 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Anderson J.S., Batra R., Fitzpatrick D.C., Teissier N. . 2002. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 188–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi E.C., Folsom R.C., Dobie R.A. 1993. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res, 68, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C. . 1996. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 17, 81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdamar O., Kraus N., Grossmann J. 1986. Binaural interaction in the auditory middle latency response of the guinea pig. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 63, 476–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton, T. 2007. Audiometry Using Auditory Steady-State Responses, Burkard, R., Eggermont, J., Don M. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 441–462.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A., Perez-Abalo M-C., Van Roon P. 2005. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 140–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S. 2004. Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 541–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell D.W., Dajani H.R. 2008. The stimulus-response relationship in auditory steady-state response testing. G. Rance Auditory Steady-State Response: Generation, Recording, and Clinical Applications. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc., 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. 1995. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear, 16, 499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries D.T. 2007. The influence of noise type and level upon stochastic resonance in human audition. Hear Res, 228, 136–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez R., Picton T., Linden D., Hamel G., Laframboise G. 1986. Human auditory steady state responses: Effects of intensity and frequency. Ear Hear, 7, 300–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Draganova R., Picton T.W., Pantev C. 2003. Frequency specificity of 40-kHz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res, 186, 57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz D.W.F., Taylor P. 2005. Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats. Clin Neurophysiol, 116, 658–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollman M.H., Snik A.F., Hombergen G.C., Nieuwenhuys R., ten Koppel P. 1996. Detection of the binaural interaction component in the auditory brainstem response. Br J Audiol, 30, 227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroebel D., Swanepoel D.W., Groenewald E. 2007. Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants. Int J Audiol, 46, 287–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalda K., Burkard R. 2005. The effects of nembutal anesthesia on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the chinchilla. Hear Res, 203, 32–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thodi C., Katbamna B. 1993. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: Multichannel recordings. Scand Audiol, 22, 205–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A., Stapells D.R. 2009. Normal multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to air-conducted stimuli in infants. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 196–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Werff K.R., Brown C.J. 2005. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 26, 310–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodford C.M., Henderson D., Hamernik R.P., Feldman A.S. 1976. Acoustic reflex threshold of the chinchilla as a function of stimulus duration and frequency. J Acoust Soc Am, 59, 1204–1207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Fu Q.J., Morse R. 2000. Human hearing enhanced by noise. Brain Res, 869, 251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenker Castro F., Fernandez Belda R., Barajas de Prat J.J. 2006. Fitting hearing aids in early childhood based on auditory evoked potentials in steady states. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 57, 388–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwislocki J.J., Buining E., Glantz J. 1968. Frequency distribution of central masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 43, 1267–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar