340
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings

Pages 634-644 | Received 18 Feb 2009, Accepted 06 Mar 2010, Published online: 06 Jul 2010

References

  • Agnew J., Thornton J.M. 2000. Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 330–336.
  • ANSI 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI S3.5-1997.
  • Bech S., Zacharov N. 2006. Perceptual Audio Evaluation: Theory, Method and Application, Wiley.
  • Bradley R.A. 1984. Paired comparisons: Some basic procedures and examples. P.R. Krishnaiah, P.K. Sen, Handbook of Statistics, 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 299–326.
  • Choisel, Wickelmaier. 2007. Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: Scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference, J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 388–400.
  • Egner T. 1953. Klatremus og de andre dyr i Hakkebakkeskoven (In Danish), Gyldendal.
  • Ellermeier W., Made M., Danie P. 2004. Scaling the unpleasantness of sounds according to the BTL model: Ratio-scale representation and psychoacoustical analysis. Acustica, 90, 101–107.
  • Groth J., Søndergaard M.B. 2003. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings. Int J Audiol, 43, 594–599.
  • Hinkelmann K., Kempthorne O. 2008. Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume 1, Introduction to Experimental Design. Wiley.
  • Keidser G., Carter L., Chalupper J., Dillon H. 2007. Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 46, 554–568.
  • Müsch H., Nooraei N., Edwards B., Pavlovic C. 2004. Permissible delay in a partially occluding monaurally fit hearing aid. Poster presented at IHCON 2004, LakeTahoe, USA.
  • Pavlovic C., Hou J., Müsch H. 2009. SII: Speech Intelligibility Index. http://www.sii.to
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 1999. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear Hear, 20, 182–192.
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2002. Tolerable hearing aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production. Ear Hear, 23, 325–338.
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2003. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear Hear, 24, 175–183.
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2005. Tolerable hearing-aid delays IV. Effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects. Ear Hear, 26, 225–235.
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J., Meisenbacher K., Derleth R.P. 2008. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings. Ear Hear, 29, 601–617.
  • Tversky A., Sattah S. 1979. Preference trees. Psychological Review, 86, 542–573.
  • Wickelmaier F., Schmid C. 2004. A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 29–40.
  • Zimmer K., Ellermeier W., Schmid C. 2004. Using probabilistic choice models to investigate auditory unpleasantness. Acustica, 90, 1019–1028.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.