Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA

References

• Beck L.B. 2000. The role of outcomes data in health-care resources allocation. Ear Hear, 21(4), 89S–96S.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Niebuhr D.P., Getta J.P., Anderson C.V. 1993. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res, 36(4), 820–831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bille M., Jensen A.M., Kjaerbol E., Vesterager V., Sibelle P. . 1999. Clinical study of a digital vs. an analogue hearing aid. Scand Audiol, 28(2), 127–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen X., Ender P., Mitchell M., Wells C. 2003. Regression with Stata. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21(4), 106S–115S.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. 1995. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16(2), 176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. 2000. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 368–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. 2001. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear, 22(2), 151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41(1), 30–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Beyer C.M. 2003. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 14(8), 403–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H., Birtles G., Lovegrove R. 1999. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: Normative data for the client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and the hearing aid user's questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., James A., J. Ginis. 1997. Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 8(1), 27–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon H. 2001. Hearing Aids. Sydney, New York: Boomerang Press; Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J. 1998. Practical Audiology for Speech-Language Therapists. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43(2), 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuermann H., Kinkel M., Tchorz J.R. 2005. Comparison of psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) in various studies. Int J Audiol, 44(2), 102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L., Timm M., Worrall L., Bishop K. 1999. Hearing aid fitting: Outcomes for older adults. Aust J Audiol, 21(1), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hosford-Dunn H., Halpern J. 2001. Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: Predictive validity of fitting variables. Satisfaction with amplification in daily life. J Am Acad Audiol, 12(1), 15–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2000a. MarkeTrak V: Consumer satisfaction revisited. Hear J, 53(1), 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2000b. MarkeTrak V: ‘Why my hearing aids are in the drawer’: The consumer's perspective. Hear J, 53(2), 34, 36, 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2005. MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J, 58(9).
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschler W.A., Boymans M., Festen J.M. 2002. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOA-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41(1), 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metselaar M., Maat B., Krijnen P., Verschuure H., Dreschler W.A. . 2008. Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: Comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids, and uni- and bilateral fittings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, Open access at Springerlink.com
   Google Scholar
• Noble W., Gatehouse S. 2004. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss: Speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol, 43(2), 100–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg M., Lunner T., Andersson G. 2007. Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiol Med, 5, 188–199.
   Google Scholar
• Parving A. 2003. The hearing aid revolution: Fact or fiction? Acta Otolaryngologica, 123(2), 245–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preves D. 2000. Hearing aids and listening in noise. Seminars in Hearing, 21(2), 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer J.B. 1998. Factors predictive of patient satisfaction with hearing aids. Hearing J, 51(3), 34–36, 38, 42.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2007. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. Station TX: Stata Corporation, College.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens D. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the client-oriented scale of improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol, 41(1), 42–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uriarte M., Denzin L., Dunstan A., Sellars J., Hickson L. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol, 16(6), 383–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Brink R.H., Wit H.P., Kempen G.I., van Heuvelen M.J. 1996. Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol, 30, 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L., Hickson L., McPherson B. 2003. Hearing aid satisfaction: What does research from the past 20 years say? Trends Amplif, 7(4), 117–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar