Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch

References

• Aiken S.S. Picton T.T. 2006. Envelope following responses to natural vowels. Audiol Neurootol, 11, 213–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D.D. Bland J.J. 1994. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. British Medical Journal, 308(6943), 1552.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P. 1993. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proc Inst of Phon Sci, 17, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P. Weenink D. 2009. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer.
   Google Scholar
• Dajani H.H., Purcell D., Wong W., Kunov H. Picton T.T. 2005. Recording human evoked potentials that follow the pitch contour of a natural vowel. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 52, 1614–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Wegner O., Mellert V. Kollmeier B. 2000. Auditory brain-stem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1530–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T. 2003. The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 113(2), 936–50.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch D., Henthorn T. Dolson M. 2004. Absolute pitch, speech, and tone language: Some experiments and a proposed framework. Music Percept, 21, 339–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith G.G., Amaya E.E., de Rivera J.J., Donan N.N., Duong M.M.. 2004. Brain stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans. Neuroreport, 15(13), 2057–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gandour J., Wong D. Hutchins G. 1998. Pitch processing in the human brain is influenced by language experience. Neuroreport, 9, 2115–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein M.M. Kiang N.N.S. 1958. Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 30, 107–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz M.M., Zhang X., Brucc I.I. Carncy L.L. 2001. Auditory-nerve model for predicting performance limits of normal and impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (Acoustics Research Letters Online), 2(3), 91–6. (DOI 10.1121/1.1387155)
   Google Scholar
• Jeng F-C. Schnabel E.E. 2009. Frequency-Following Responses to Voice Pitch in Infants. In: Abstracts of American Auditory Society Annual Meeting, p. 21 (#62), Scottsdale, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N. Nicol T. 2005. Brainstem origins for cortical ‘what’ and ‘where’ pathways in the auditory system. Trends Neurosci, 28(4), 176–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan A., Gandour J.J., Bidelman G.G. Swaminathan J. 2009a. Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem. Neuroreport, 20(4), 408–13.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan A., Gandour J.J. Bidelman G.G. 2010. The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem. J Neurolinguist, 23, 81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A., Swaminathan J. Gandour J.J. 2009b. Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context. J Cognitive Neurosci, 21, 1092–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A., Xu Y., Gandour J.J. Cariani P. 2004. Human frequency-following response: Representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones. Hear Res, 189, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A., Xu Y., Gandour J.J. Cariani P. 2005. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Cogn Brain Res, 25, 161–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee C-Y. Lee Y-F. 2010. Perception of musical pitch and lexical tones by Mandarin-speaking musicians. J Acoust Soc Am, 127(1), 481–90.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.B.J. Glasberg B.B. 1986. The role of frequency selectivity in the perception of loudness, pitch, and time. In: B.C.J. Moore Frequency Selectivity in Hearing. London: Academic Press, pp. 251–308.
   Google Scholar
• Musacchia G., Sams M., Skoe E. Kraus N. 2007. Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 104(40), 15894–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. 2009. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/coch.asp
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1967. Pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 41, 1526–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritsma R. 1967. Frequency dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 42, 191–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo N.N., Skoe E., Trommer B., Nicol T., Zecker S. . 2008. Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders. Clin Neurophysiol, 119(8), 1720–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz D.D. 1987. Neruodiagnostic audiology: Contemporary perspectives. Ear Hear, 8(4), Suppl., 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Song J.J., Skoe E., Wong P.P.M. Kraus N. 2008. Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training. J Cognitive Neurosci, 20(10), 1892–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan J., Krishnan A. Gandour J.J. Xu Y. 2008a. Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 55(1), 281–7.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan J., Krishnan A. Gandour J.J. 2008b. Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem. Neuroreport, 19, 1163–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P.P.M., Skoe E., Russo N.N., Dees T. Kraus N. 2007. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci, 10(4), 420–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar