Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices

References

• American National Standards Institute. 1999. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms (ANSI S3.1 1-1999). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1997. Methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index (ANSI S3.5-1997). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1997. Guidelines for Screening Infants and Children for Outer and Middle Ear Disorders, Birth Through 18 Years.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Nittrouer S. 1988. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 84, 101–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R., Keidser G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Dillon H., Byrne D. 1998. Speech recognition of hearing- impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 1128–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Dillon H., Katsch R., Byrne D. 2001. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear, 22, 212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D., Schaefer A.B. 1989. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggirala V., Studebaker G.A., Pavlovic C.V., Sherbecoe R.L. 1988. Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 2372–2382.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott L.L., Busse L.A., Partridge R., Rupert J., DeGraaff R. 1986. Adult and child discrimination of CV syllables differing in voicing onset time. Child Dev, 57, 628–635.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon M., Trehub S.E., Schneider B.A. 2002. Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2242–2249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French N.R., Steinberg J.C. 1947. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 19, 90–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. 1998. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B.W., Ricketts T.A. 2003. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1706–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B.W., Ricketts T.A. 2006. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1752–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. 2002. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1112–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Riker S. 1992. Evaluation of two clinical versions of the articulation index. Ear Hear, 13, 406–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamm C.A., Dirks D.D., Bell T.S. 1985. Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 77, 281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortekaas R.W., Stelmachowicz P.G. 2000. Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: Acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 645–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L. 1996. Speech intelligibility index transfer functions and speech spectra for two Swedish speech recognition tests. Scand Audiol, 25, 59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlot S., Buss E., Hall J.W. III. 2010. Spectral integration and bandwidth effects on speech recognition in school-aged children and adults. Ear Hear, 31, 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Musch H., Buus S. 2001a. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 2896–2909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musch H., Buus S. 2001b. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 2910–2920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Hochberg I. 1983. Children's perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 2145–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S., Boothroyd A. 1990. Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2705–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe D.P. 1975. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 84, 1–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavlovic C.V., Studebaker G.A. 1984. An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation index. J Acoust Soc Am, 75, 1606–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic C.V., Studebaker G.A., Sherbecoe R.L. 1986. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman A. 2008a. Perceptual coherence in listeners having longstanding childhood hearing losses, listeners with adult-onset hearing losses, and listeners with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 441–449.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman A.L. 2008b. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J.Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 785–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman A.L., Stelmachowicz P.G. 2000. Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 1389–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. 1991. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 391–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seewald R., Moodie S., Scollie S., Bagatto M. 2005. The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: Historical perspective and current issues. Trends Amplif, 9, 145–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherbecoe R.L., Studebaker G.A. 2003. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners’ performance on the connected speech test. Ear Hear, 24, 71–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherbecoe R.L., Studebaker G.A. 2002. Audibility-index functions for the connected speech test. Ear Hear, 23, 385–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A., McDermott H.J., Dowell R.C. 2005. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Hear Res, 210, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Karstaedt M.M., Miller J.D. 1982. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 21, 251–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Miller J.D. 1983. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 22, 253–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steeneken H.J.M., Houtgast T. 1999. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility. Speech Communication, 28, 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Kortekaas R.W., Pittman A.L. 2000. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 902–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E. 2002. Aided perception of /s/ and /z/ by hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear, 23, 316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E. 2001. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2183–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Moeller M.P. 2004. The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 556–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A. 1985. A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Pavlovic C.V., Sherbecoe R.L. 1987. A frequency importance function for continuous discourse. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1130–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Sherbecoe R.L. 1991. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 427–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Sherbecoe R.L., Gilmore C. 1993. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. J Speech Hear Res, 36, 799–807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Sherbecoe R.L., McDaniel D.M., Gray G.A. 1997. Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 150–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar