The role of word familiarity in Spanish/English bilingual word recognition

References

• American National Standards Institute. 2004. ANSI-S3.6-2004, Specifications for Audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Edgerton B.J., Svihoreg D.J. 1977. A comparison of the Auditec of St. Louis cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on a normal-hearing population. J Speech Hear Disord, 42, 60–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell T.S., Wilson R.H. 2001. Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 514–522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berruecos P.T., Rodríguez J.L. 1967. Determination of the phonetic percent in the Spanish language spoken in Mexico City, and formation of P.B. lists of trochaic words. Int Audiol, 6, 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. 1997. Auditory development of the hearing child. Scand Audiol Suppl, 46, 9–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradlow A.R., Pisoni D.B. 1999. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2074–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. 1951. Basic principles of speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol, 40, 62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely J.A., Yager C.R. 1993. Scoring Spanish word-recognition measures. Ear Hear, 14, 395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole R.A, Jekimik J. 1980. A model of speech perception. R.A. Cole, Perception and Production of Fluent Speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 122–163.
   Google Scholar
• Danhauer J.L., Crawford S. & Edgerton B.J. 1984. English, Spanish, and Bilingual speakers’ performance on a Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) speech sound discrimination. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 164–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delgado P., Guerrero G., Goggin J.P., Ellis B.B. 1999. Self-assessment of linguistic skills by bilingual Hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci, 21, 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein A., Giolas T.G., Owens E. 1968. Familiarity and intelligibility of monosyllabic word lists. J Speech Hear Res, 11, 435–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flege J.E., MacKay I.R.A., Piske T. 2002. Assessing bilingual dominance. Appl Psycholinguist, 23, 567–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J.E., Takagi N., Mann V. 1996. Lexical familiarity and English-language Experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /r/ and /l/. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 1161–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores L., Aoyama K. 2008. A comparison of psychometric performance on four modified Spanish word recognition tests. Tex J Audiol Speech Lang Pathol, 31, 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder U.H., Baayen R.H., Hellwig F.M., Schreuder R. 1993. Neighborhood density and frequency across language and modalities. J Mem Lang, 32, 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gat I.B., Keith R.W. 1978. An effect of linguistic experience. Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. Audiology, 17, 339–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gernsbacher M.A. 1984. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity, orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. J Exp Psychol Gen, 113, 256–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I.J., Davis H., Silverman S.R., Reynolds E.G., Eldert E. . 1952. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord, 17, 321–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudgins C.V., Hawkins J.E., Karlin J.E., Stevens S.S. 1947. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, 57, 57–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai S., Walley A.C., Flege J. E. 2005. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accent words by native English and Spanish listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 896–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juilland A., Chang-Rodríguez E. 1964. Frequency Dictionary of Spanish Words. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Luce P.A., Pison D.B. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear Hear, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyregaard P. 1976. On the relationship between recognition and familiarity of words. NPL Acoustic Report AC 78. Teddington, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Marian V., Blumenfeld H.K., Kaushanskaya M. 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 940–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo L.H., Florentine M., Buus S. 1997. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R., Wilson R. H. 2008. Prediction of word recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 507–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough J.A., Wilson R.H. 2001. Performance on a Spanish picture-identification task using a multimedia format. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 254–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen W.O., Matkin N.D. 1991. Speech audiometry. W.F. Rintelmann, Hearing Assessment. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon, 39–141.
   Google Scholar
• Owens E. 1961. Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity. J Speech Hear Res, 4, 113–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollack M. 1971. Development of a Test of Auditory Word Discrimination in Spanish. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I., Rubenstein H., Decker L. 1959. Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. J Acoust Soc Am, 31, 273–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C., Lister J., Febo D., Besing J., Abrams H. 2006. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Appl Psycholinguist, 27, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig M.R., Postman L. 1957. Intelligibility as a function of frequency of usage. J Exp Psychol, 54, 412–422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider B.S. 1992. Effect of dialect on the determination of speech-reception thresholds in spanish-speaking children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 23, 159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2010. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 821–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F., Sánchez D. 2010. Spanish/English bilingual listeners on clinical word recognition tests: What to expect and how to predict. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., Sherbecoe R.L., Gilmore C. 1993. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. J Speech Hear Res, 36, 799–807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takayanagi S., Dirks D.D., Moshfegh A. 2002. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 585–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman T.W., Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• United States Bureau of the Census. 2007. Press Release CB 07–70.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch M.S., Rodríguez E. 2005. Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. J Multiling Commun Disord, 3, 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• von Hapsburg D., Champlin C.A., Shetty S.R. 2004. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 88–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber A., Cutler A. 2004. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. J Mem Lang, 50, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisleder P., Hodgson W.R. 1989. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition-ability lists. Ear Hear, 10, 388–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss D., Dempsey J.J. 2008. Performance of bilingual speakers on the English and Spanish versions of the Hearing in the Noise Test (HINT). J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Coley K.E., Hanel J.L., Browning K.M. 1976. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6: Normative and comparative intelligibility functions. J Am Audiol Soc, 5, 221–228.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., McArdle R., Roberts H. 2008. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU No. 6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 496–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Oyler A.L. 1997. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. materials spoken by the same speaker. Ear Hear, 18, 430–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young L.L., Dudley N., Gunter M.B. 1982. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res, 25, 586–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zubick H.H., Irizarry L.M., Rosen L., Feudo P. Jr., Kelly J.H. . 1983. Development of speech-audiometric materials for native Spanish-speaking adults. Audiology, 22, 88–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar