References
- Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Etler C.P. 2006. Electrophysiology and device telemetry. S.B. Waltzman, J.T. Roland Cochlear Implants (2nd edition). New York: Thieme, 96–109.
- Boyd P.J. 2006. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 27(6), 608–618.
- Cox R.M., McDaniel D.M. 1989. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test for hearing aid comparisons. J Speech Hearing Res, 32, 347–352.
- Govaerts P.J., Daemers K., Yperman M., De Beukelaer C., De Saegher G. . 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E®): A new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants Int, 7(2), 92–106.
- Govaerts P.J., Vaerenberg B., De Ceulaer G., Daemers K., De Beukelaer C. . 2010. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otol Neurotol, 31(6), 908–918.
- Niparko J.K., Oviatt D.L., Coker N.J., Sutton L., Waltzman S.B. . 1991. Facial nerve stimulation with cochlear implantation. VA Cooperative Study Group on Cochlear Implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 104(6), 826–830.
- Roditi R.E., Poissant S.F., Bero E.M., Lee D.J. 2009. A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol, 30(4), 449–454.
- Schaub A. 2010. Solving the trade-off between speech understanding and listening comfort. Hear J, 63(7), 26–29.
- Smoorenburg G.F., Willeboer C., van Dijk J.E. 2002. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol, 7, 335–347.
- Walravens E., Mawman D., O'Driscoll M. 2006. Changes in psychophysical parameters during the first month of programming the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 7(1), 15–32.
- Willeboer C., Smoorenburg G.F. 2006. Comparing cochlear implant users’ speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study. Ear Hear, 27(6), 789–798.
- Wouters J., Damman W., Bosman A. 1995. Evaluation of Flemish-Dutch materials for speech audiometry. R. Schoonhoven, T. Kapteyn, J. de Laat Proceedings of the European Conference on Audiology, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 417–420.