An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Within-channel and across-channel gap detection

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. (Central) Auditory processing disorders [technical report]. Available from www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language Hearing Association Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. 1996. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol, 5(2), 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis T. 2003. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice (2nd). Clifton Park, USA: Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chermak G., Lee J. 2005. Comparison of children's performance on four tests of temporal resolution. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 554–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak G., Musiek F. 1997. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego, USA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R. 1985. A structured approach to hearing aid selection. Ear Hear, 6(5), 226–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. 1989. Comfortable loudness level: Stimulus effects, long-term reliability and predictability. J Sp Hear Res, 32, 816–828.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubno J., Horwitz A., Ahlstrom J. 2003. Recovery from prior stimulation: Masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older listeners with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 2084–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddins D., Hall J., Grose J. 1992. The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel D. 2002. The auditory processing battery: Survey of common practices. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 93–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgibbons P., Gordon-Salant S. 1987. Minimum stimulus levels for gap resolution in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 81(5), 1542–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formby C., Gerber M., Sherlock L., Magder L. 1998. Evidence for an across-frequency, between channel process in asymptotic monaural temporal gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 3554–3560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formby C., Barker C., Abbey H., Raney J. 1993. Detection of silent temporal gaps between narrow-band noise markers having second-formantlike properties of voiceless stop/vowel combinations. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 1023–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons P. 1993. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 36, 1276–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons F. 1999. Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 42, 300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose J., Hall J., Buss E., Hatch D. 2001. Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(4), 1587–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He N., Horwitz A., Dubno J., Mills J. 1999. Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 966–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Musiek F. 2000. Report on the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11(9), 467–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith R. 2000. Random Gap Detection Test [manual]. St. Louis, USA: Auditec of St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Gilkey R., Seiben U. 1988. Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: A comparison of human data and a mathematical model. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1852–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon A., Eriksson-Mangold M., Bech-Karlsen A. 1984. Preferred hearing aid gain and bass-cut in relation to prescriptive fitting. Scand Audiol, 13, 157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Besing J., Koehnke J. 2002. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap duration discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2793–2800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Maxfield N., Pitt G. 2007. Cortical evoked responses to gaps in noise: Within-channel and across-channel conditions. Ear Hear, 28(6), 862–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Roberts R. 2005. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: Narrow-band stimuli. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 48, 482–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Roberts R., Shackelford J., Rogers C. 2006. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Am J Audiol, 15, 133–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lister J., Tarver K. 2004. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. J Sp Hear Res, 47, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Jesteadt W. 1986. Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and 2-interval forced-choice procedures. J Sp Hear Res, 29, 82–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCroskey R., Keith R. 1996. Auditory Fusion Test-Revised: Instruction and User's Manual. St. Louis, USA: Auditec of St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F., Shinn J., Jirsa R., Bamiou D., Baran J., . 2005. GIN (gaps-in-noise) test peformance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear, 26, 608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P., Thomas S. 1997. Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss. J Sp Lang Hear Rese, 40, 1387–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. 2000. Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2215–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R., Moore B.C.J. Baer T. 1998. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral dips for hearing-impaired and normally-hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D., Hall S., Harrington I., Taylor T. 1998. ‘Central’ auditory gap detection: A spatial case. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 2064–2068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D., Smith J. 2004. Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners. Perception, 33, 371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D., Taylor T., Hall S., Carr M., Mossop J. 1997. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of central auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 101(6), 3694–3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1964. Rate of decay of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am, 36, 277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts R., Lister J. 2004. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: Broad-band stimuli. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 47, 965–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammeth C., Birman M., Hecox K. 1989. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. Ear Hear, 10, 94–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Hamstra S. 1999. Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shailer M., Moore B. 1983. Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. J Acoust Soc Am, 74(2), 467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell K., Ison J., Frisina R. 1994. The effects of signal frequency and absolute bandwidth on gap detection in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Phillips D. 1996. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Ear Hear, 17, 478–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M., Forbes S., Creelman C. 1983. PEST reduces bias in forced-choice psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am, 74, 1367–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weihing J., Musiek F., Shinn J. 2007. The effect of presentation level on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN©) test. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. 1980. A device for measuring the temporal resolution of the ear, Audio-logical Acoustics, 19, 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Schorn K. 1982. Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. Audiology, 21, 474–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar