Development of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ)

References

• American National Standards Institute. 2004. Specification of audiometers (S3.6-2004). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 1997. Self efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 2001. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. F. Pajares, T. Urdan Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. USA: Information Age Publishing, 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Borg E. 2000. Ecological aspect of auditory rehabilitation . Acta Otolaryngol, 120, 234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E., Danermark B., Borg B. 2002. Behavioral awareness, interaction, and counselling education in audiological rehabilitation: Development of methods and application in a pilot study. Int J Audiol, 41, 308–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E. 2003. Assessment of communicating systems of the basis of an ecological conceptual framework. Int J Audiol, 42, 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E., Bergkvist C., Olsson I., Wikstrom C., Borg B. 2008. Communication as an ecological system. Int J Audiol, 47 (Suppl. 2) S131–S138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. 1995. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear, 16, 176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Veterans Affairs. 2006. Speech recognition and identification materials. Disc 4.0 (compact disc). Mountain Home (USA): Department of Veterans Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis R.F. 1991. Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 26). Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards B. 2007. The future of hearing aid technology. Trends Amplif, 11, 31–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finny D.J. 1952. Statistical Method in Biological Assay. London: C. Griffen.
   Google Scholar
• Franzblau A. 1958. A Primer of Statistics for Non-Statisticians. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray T.F., Speaks C.E. 1978. Ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand connected discourse. J Am Audiol Soc, 3, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson G., Sofroniou N. 1999. The Multivariate Social Scientist. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2000. ISO-7029: Acoustics statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings S. 2005. Factors that influence outcomes from aural rehabilitation of older adults: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Unpublished dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser H.F. 1970. A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser H.F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn M.R. 1986. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res, 35, 382–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W. 1983. Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: A theoretical method. Audiol, 22, 325–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Hétu R. 1994. An ecological approach to disability and handicap in relation to impaired hearing. Audiol, 33, 117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh S., Gangé J-P., Kaspar J. 1994. Models of health behaviors and compliance: Applications to audiologic rehabilitation. J Acad Rehab Audiol, 27, 375–389.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2008. Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing. Int J Audiol, 47 (Suppl. 2), S144–154.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amp, 10, 29–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plack K., Herpertz S., Petrak F. 2010. Behavioral medicine interventions in diabetes. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 23, 131–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit D., Hungler B. 1999. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Forsline A., Fausti S.A. 2004. The Performance Perceptual Test and its relationship to unaided reported handicap. Ear Hear, 25, 117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S.L., West R.L. 2006. The application of self-efficacy principles to audiologic rehabilitation: A tutorial. Am J Audiol, 15, 46–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens D. 1997. Audiological rehabilitation. D. Stephens Scott Brown's Otolaryngology. Vol. 2: Adult Audiology. 6th. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens D., Hétu R. 1991. Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: Towards a consensus. Audiol, 30, 185–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman T.W., Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Trouillet R., Gana K., Lourel M., Fort I. 2009. Predictive value of age for coping: The role of self-efficacy, social support satisfaction and perceived stress. Aging Ment Health, 13, 357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Bijl J.J., Shortridge-Baggett L.M. 2001. The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. Sch Inq Nurs Pract, 15, 189–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventry I.M., Weinstein B.E. 1982. The Hearing Handicap Inventory of the Elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry I., Weinstein B. 1983. Idenitifcation of elderly people with hearing problems. Am Speech Lang Hear Assoc, 25, 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• West R.L., Smith S.L. 2007. Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Audiol, 46, 759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H. 2003. Development of a speech in multitalker babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 453–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Abrams H.B., Pillion A.L. 2003. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble. J Rehabil Res Dev, 40, 321–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Burks C.A. 2005. The use of 35 words to evaluate hearing loss in terms of signal-to-babble ratio: A clinical protocol. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 839–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., McArdle R., Smith S.L. 2007. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 844–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., Tun P.A. 2007. Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 548–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghmaie R. 2003. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ, 3, 25–27.
   Google Scholar