Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: A comparison between two tests

References

• ANSI S3.5–1997. 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brand T., Hohmann H. 2001. Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling. Audiology, 40(2), 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Brand T., Hohmann H. 2002. An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am, 112(4), 1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Laat J.A., Plomp R. 1983. The reception threshold of interrupted speech for hearing-impaired listeners. R. Klinke, R. Hartman Hearing – Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 359–363.
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W.A., Plomp R. 1985. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. J Acoust Soc Am, 78(4), 1261–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W.A., Leeuw A.R. 1990. Speech reception in reverberation related to temporal resolution. J Speech Hear Res, 33(1), 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Duifhuis H. 1973. Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 54(6), 1471–1488.
   Google Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. 1981. Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 70(2), 356–369.
   Google Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. 1983. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 73(2), 652–662.
   Google Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. 1990. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(4), 1725–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George E.L., Festen J.M., Houtgast T. 2006. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 120(4), 2295–2311.
   Google Scholar
• George E.L., Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Festen J.M. . 2007. Auditory and non-auditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 121(4), 2362–2375.
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79(4), 1020–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C. 1989. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scand Audiol (Suppl.), 32, 1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilkhuysen G.L.M., Houtgast T., Lyzenga J. 2005. Estimating cochlear-filter shapes, temporal-window width and compression from tone-sweep detection in spectral and temporal noise gaps. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 2589–2599.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389–1. 1998. Acoustics – reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment – Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kaernbach C. 1990. A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(6), 2645–2655.
   Google Scholar
• Larsby B., Arlinger S. 1998. A method for evaluating temporal, spectral and combined temporal-spectral resolution of hearing. Scand Audiol, 27(1), 3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsby B., Arlinger S. 1999. Auditory temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 10(4), 198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw A.R., Dreschler W.A. 1994. Frequency-resolution measurements with notched noises for clinical purposes. Ear Hear, 15(3), 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971, Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49 (2), Suppl.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 1987. Distribution of auditory-filter bandwidths at 2 kHz in young normal listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 81(5), 1633–1635.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R., Plack C.J., Biswas A.K. 1988. The shape of the ear's temporal window. J Acoust Soc Am, 83(3), 1102–1116.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Peters R.W., Glasberg B.R. 1990. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(1), 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 1998. Cochlear hearing loss. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Noordhoek I.M., Houtgast T., Festen J.M. 2001. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(3), 1197–1212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D.L., Milroy R. 1982. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 72(6), 1788–1803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plack C.J., Moore B.C. 1990. Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level. J Acoust Soc Am, 87(5), 2178–2187.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18(1), 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pumplin J. 1985, Low-noise noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 78(1), 100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J., Dreschler W.A. 2006. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 120(6), 3988–3997.
   Google Scholar
• Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M., Houtgast T. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107(3), 1671–1684.
   Google Scholar