Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users

References

• Bachorowski J.A., Owren M. 1999. Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 1054–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M., Peng S.C. 2008. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition. Hear Res, 235, 143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F., Loizou P.C. 2011. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech. Ear Hear, Epub ahead of print.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Gifford R.H., Spahr A.J., McKarns S.A. 2008. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice, and melodies. Audiol Neurootol, 13, 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellowes J.M., Remez R.E., Rubin P.E. 1997. Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre. Percept Psychophys, 59, 839–849.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu Q.-J. 2002. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport, 13, 1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.-J., Chinchilla S., Galvin J.J. 2004. Voice gender discrimination and vowel recognition in normal-hearing and cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5, 253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.-J., Chinchilla S., Nogaki G., Galvin J.J. 2005. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: The role of spectral and temporal resolution. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1711–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear, 28, 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez J., Oliver J.C. 2005. Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 461–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D.D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry B.A., Turner C.W., Behrens A. 2005. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1111–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J.M., Getty L.A., Clark M.J., Wheeler K. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3099–3111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J.M., Clark M.J. 2009. The role of f(0) and formant frequencies in distinguishing the voices of men and women. Attention Percept Psychophys, 71, 1150–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T., Galvin J.J., Fu Q.-J. 2009. Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech. Ear Hear, 30, 238–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li T., Fu Q.-J. 2010. Perceptual adaptation of voice gender discrimination with spectrally shifted vowels. J Speech Lang Hear Res, Epub ahead of print.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo X., Fu Q.-J., Wei C.G., Cao K.L. 2008. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 29, 957–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvak L.M., Spahr A.J., Saoji A.A., Fridman G.Y. 2007. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 982–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Jensvold A., Padilla M., Robert M.E., Wang X. 1999. Consonant recordings for speech testing. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 71–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M., Fullgrabe C., Moore B. 2008. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: Effects of number of channels and spectral region. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 2272–2282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongphoe M., Zeng F.-G. 2005. Speaker recognition with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1055–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Rubinstein J.T. 2007. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 384–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Kang R.S., Rubinstein J.T. 2010. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 31, 796–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L., Zheng Y. 2007. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1758–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar