1,013
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Note

A study of recorded versus live voice word recognition

&
Pages 688-693 | Received 03 Jan 2011, Accepted 13 May 2011, Published online: 03 Aug 2011

References

  • ANSI. R2003. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms (ANSI S3.1-1999). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • ANSI. R2002. Specifications for instruments to measure aural acoustic impedance and admittance (aural acoustic immittance) (ANSI S3. 39-1987). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • ANSI. 2004. Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-2004). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • Beattie R.C., Svihovec D.A. & Edgerton B.J. 1978. Comparison of speech detection and spondee thresholds and half- versus full-list intelligibility scores with MLV and taped presentation of NU-6. J Am Aud Soc, 3(6), 267–272.
  • Brandy W.T. 1966. Reliability of voice tests of speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res, 9, 461–465.
  • Carhart R. 1946. Speech reception in relation to pattern of pure tone loss. J SpeechHear Dis, 11, 97–108.
  • Carhart R. 1965. Problems in the measurement of speech discrimination. Arch Otolaryng, 82, 253–260.
  • Creston J.E., Gillespie M. & Krohn C. 1966. Speech audiometry: Taped vs. live voice. Arch Otolaryng, 83, 40–43.
  • Hirsh I.J., Davis H., Silverman S.R., Reynolds E.G., Eldert E. . 1952. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Dis, 17(3), 321–337.
  • Hood J.D. & Poole J.P. 1980. Influence of the speaker and other factors affecting speech intelligibility. Audiology, 19, 434–455.
  • Kreul E.J., Bell D.W. & Nixon J.C. 1969. Factors affecting speech discrimination test difficulty. J Speech Hear Res, 12, 281–287.
  • Martin F.N., Armstrong T. & Champlin C.A. 1994. A survey of audiological practices in the United States. Am J Audiol, 3, 20–26.
  • Martin F.N., Champlin C.A. & Chambers J.A. 1998. Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 95–104.
  • Martin F.N. & Forbis N.K. 1978. The present status of audiometric practice: A follow-up study. Asha, 20(7), 531–541.
  • Martin F.N. & Morris L.J. 1989. Current audiologic practices in the United States. HearJ, 42(4), 25–44.
  • Martin F.N. & Pennington C.D. 1971. Current trends in audiometric practices. Asha, 13(11), 671–677.
  • Martin F.N. & Sides D.G. 1985. Survey of current audiometric practices. Asha, 27(2), 29–36.
  • Mendel L.L. & Danhauer J.L. 1997. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
  • Mullennix J.W., Pisoni D.B. & Martin C.S. 1989. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 85(1), 365–378.
  • Penrod J.P. 1979. Talker effects on word-discrimination scores of adults with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Dis, XLIV, 340–349.
  • Roeser R.J. & Clark J.L. 2008. Live voice speech recognition audiometry: Stop the madness! Audiology Today, 20(1), 32–33.
  • Sherbecoe R.L. & Studebaker G.A. 2004. Supplementary formulae and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units. Int J Aud, 43, 442–448.
  • Studebaker G.A. 1985. A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
  • Wiley T.L., Stoppenbach D.T., Feldhake L.J., Moss K.A. & Thordardottir E.T. 1995. Audiologic practices: What is popular versus what is supported by evidence. Am J Audiol, 4(1), 26–34.
  • Wilson R.H. & McArdle R. 2008. Change is in the air: In more ways than one. Hear J, 61, 10–15.
  • Thornton A.R. & Raffin M. 1978. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res, 21, 507–518.
  • Tillman T.W. & Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6, United States Air Force [USAF] School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report 66-55). Brooks Air Force Base, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.