Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss

References

• Albrecht J., Elewout L., van Verhage L. & Verweij C. 2005. Oorcheck: De validering van een interactief screenings instrument. Internal report, LUMC Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon S.P., Opie J.M. & Montoya D.Y. 1998. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 549–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biassoni E.C., Serra M.R., Richtert U., Joekes S., Yacci M.R. . 2005. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part II: Development of hearing disorders. Int J Audiol, 44, 74–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman A.J. 1989. Speech perception by the hearing impaired. Thesis, University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman A.J. & Smoorenburg G.F. 1995. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung J.H., Des Roches C.M., Meunier J. & Eavey R.D. 2005. Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss in young people using a web-based survey technique. Pediatrics, 115, 861–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culling J.F., Zhao F. & Stephens D. 2005. The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment. Int J Audiol, 44, 691–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J.M. & Plomp R. 1990. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1725–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongmans P., Martens M. & Dreschler W.A. 2008. Analyse van de hoortesten van de Nationale Hoorstichting. Intern rapport, Nationale Hoorstichting, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman J., Davey E., Thomas N., Wittkop T. & Verschuure H. 2008. How should hearing screening tests be offered? Int J Audiol, 47, 230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C.J., Laat J.A.P.M & de Dreschler W.A. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Int J Audiol, submitted, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens M.K., Perenboom R.J.M., Ploeg C.P.B. & van der Dreschler W.A. 2005. Oorcheck: Analyse van gehoortesten voor jongeren over de periode april 2004–oktober 2004. TNO-rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. 1996. Epidemiological evaluation of hearing damage related to strongly amplified music (personal cassette players, discotheques, rock concerts): High-definition audiometric survey on 1364 subjects. Audiology, 35, 121–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafapour S.P., Lahargoue K. & Gates G.A. 1998. Noise-induced hearing loss in young adults: The role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise. Laryngoscope, 108, 1832–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCvB. 2010. Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2010. Internal report. Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Niskar A.S., Kieszak S.M., Holmes A.E., Esteban E., Rubin C. . 2001. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994, United States. Pediatrics, 108, 40–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek E., Kutzner D., Sek A. & Wicher A. 2009. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Int J Audiol, 48, 433–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R.W., Moore B.C. & Baer T. 1998. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Rappaport J.M. & Gulliver J.M. 1994. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: Contribution of temporal resolution defect. Am J Otol, 15, 679–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. 1986. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 146–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S., Thorud E. & Aasand G. 1979. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 360, 90–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2006. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 3988–3997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J., de Laat J.A. & Dreschler W.A. 2010. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level. Int J Audiol, 49, 856–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCENIHR. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2008. Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function. Brussels, Belgium; European Commission, October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S., Gopal B., Reis J. & Novak M. 2009. Hear today, gone tomorrow: An assessment of portable entertainment player use and hearing acuity in a community sample. J Am Board Fam Med, 22, 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shargorodsky J., Curhan S.G., Curhan G.C. & Eavey R. 2010. Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. JAMA, 304, 772–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Merkus P. & Houtgast T. 2006. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol, 31, 436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2007. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol, 46, 134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. & Phillips D.P. 1996. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Ear Hear, 17, 478–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen M., Swanepoel D.W. & Hanekom J. 2009. Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests. Int J Audiol, 48, 743–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre III P. 2008. Young adults’ use and output level settings of personal music systems. Ear Hear, 29(5), 791–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M. & Houtgast T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld N.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2002. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Brug J., Hosli E.J., van der Ploeg C.P. & Raat H. 2008. MP3 players and hearing loss: Adolescents’ perceptions of loud music and hearing conservation. J Pediatr, 152, 400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Brug J., van der Ploeg C.P. & Raat H. 2009. Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: Expert opinions from a Delphi study. Pediatrics, 123, 1257–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Verschuure H., van der Ploeg C.P., Brug J. & Raat H. 2010. Estimating adolescent risk for hearing loss based on data from a large school-based survey. Am J Public Health, 100, 1095–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C. & Brand T. 2005. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol, 44, 144–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widen S.E., Holmes A.E., Johnson T., Bohlin M. & Erlandsson S.I. 2009. Hearing, use of hearing protection, and attitudes towards noise among young American adults. Int J Audiol, 48, 537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F., Manchaiah V.K., French D. & Price S.M. 2010. Music exposure and hearing disorders: An overview. Int J Audiol, 49, 54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar