Tailoring auditory training to patient needs with single and multiple talkers: Transfer-appropriate gains on a four-choice discrimination test

References

• Barcroft J. 2002. Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Lang Learn, 52, 323–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcroft J., Sommers M. & Tye-Murray N. 2007. What learning a second language might teach us about auditory training. Semin Hear, 28, 150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Barcroft J. & Sommers M.S. 2005. Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Stud Sec Lang Acquis, 27, 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode D.L. & Oyer H.J. 1970. Auditory training and speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res, 13, 839–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradlow A.R., Pisoni D.B., Akahane-Yamada R. & Tohkura Y. 1997. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burk M.H. & Humes L.E. 2008. Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 759–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burk M.H., Humes L.E., Amos N.E. & Strauser L.E. 2006. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear, 27, 263–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik F.I.M. & Lockhart R.S. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. J Verb Learn Verb Beh, 11, 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards J.D., Wadley V.G., Myers R.S., Roenker D.L., Cissell G.M. 2002. Transfer of a speed of processing intervention to near and far cognitive functions. Gerontology, 48, 329–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. 1982. Auditory Training, Washington, D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hardison D.M. 2003. Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Appl Psycholinguist, 24, 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kricos P., Holmes A.E. & Doyle D.A. 1992. Efficacy of a communication training program for hearing-impaired elderly adults. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 25, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kricos P.B. & Holmes A.E. 1996. Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 219–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lively S.E., Logan J.S. & Pisoni D.B. 1993. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 1242–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively S.E., Pisoni D.B., Yamada R.A., Tohkura Y. & Yamada T. 1994. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2076–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan J.S., Lively S.E. & Pisoni D.B. 1991. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 874–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcardle J.J. & Prindle J.J. 2008. A latent change score analysis of a randomized clinical trial in reasoning training. Psychol Aging, 23, 702–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery A.A., Walden B.E., Schwartz D.M. & Prosek R.A. 1984. Training auditory-visual speech reception in adults with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 5, 30–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris C.D., Bransford J.D. & Franks J.J. 1977. Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. J Verb Learn Verb Beh, 16, 519–533.
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard L.C. & Pisoni D.B. 1998. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Percept Psychophys, 60, 355–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remez R.E., Fellowes J.M. & Nagel D.S. 2007. On the perception of similarity among talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 3688–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remez R.E., Fellowes J.M. & Rubin P.E. 1997. Talker identification based on phonetic information. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 23, 651–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A. & Boothroyd A. 1987. Effect of two approaches to auditory training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res, 30, 153–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schow R.L., Balsara N.R., Smedley T.C. & Whitcomb C.J. 1993. Aural rehabilitation by ASHA audiologists: 1980–1990. Am J Audiol, 2, 28–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheffert S.M., Pisoni D.B., Fellowes J.M. & Remez R.E. 2002. Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 28, 1447–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sommers M., Barcroft J. & Mulqueeny K. 2008. Further studies of acoustic variability and vocabulary learning. Chicago, USA: Psychonomic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers M.S. & Barcroft J. 2007. An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Appl Psycholinguist, 28, 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetow R. & Palmer C.V. 2005. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 494–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweetow R.W. & Sabes J.H. 2010. Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 586–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N. 1992. Laser videodisc applications in the aural rehabilitation setting: Good news for the severely and profoundly hearing-impaired patient. Am J Audiol, 1, 33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray N. 2002. Conversation made easy: Speechreading and conversation training for individuals who have hearing loss (adults and teenagers). St. Louis: Central Institute for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Mauzé E., Schroy C., Sommers M., Barcroft J. . submitted. Subjective evaluation of a computer-based auditory training program (I hear what you mean) by adults with hearing loss: Implications for improving the auditory training experience and increasing compliance.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Sommers M., Spehar B., Myerson J., Hale S. . 2008. Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions. Int J Audiol, 47 (Suppl 2), S31–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Tyler R.S., Bong B. & Nares T. 1988. Using laser videodisc technology to train speech reading and assertive listening skills. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 21, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Preece J.P. & Tye-Murray N. 1986. The Iowa Phoneme and Sentence Tests, Iowa City, USA: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Walden B.E., Erdman S.A., Montgomery A.A., Schwartz D.M. & Prosek R.A. 1981. Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res, 24, 207–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar