Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise

References

• Alsius A., Navarra J., Campbell R. & Soto-Faraco S. 2005. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology, 15, 839–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsius A., Navarra J. & Soto-Faraco S. 2007. Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1996. American national standard specification for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1996) New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson Gosselin P. & Gagné J.-P. (in press). Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Sp Lang Hear Res, [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0069)].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes P. & Lindenberger U. 1997. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging. Psychology of Aging, 12, 12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besle J., Fort A. & Delpuech C. 2004. Bimodal speech: Early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex. Eur J Neurosc, 20, 2225–2234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourland-Hicks C. & Tharpe A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 45, 573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. 1958. Perception and Communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M., Preminger J.E. & Ziegler C.H. 2007. The effect of age on visual enhancement in adults with hearing loss. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 40, 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• CHABA. 1988. Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 859–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm T., Willot J. & Lister J. 2003. The aging auditory system: Anatomic and physiologic changes and their implication for rehabilitation. Int J Audiol, 42(2), 2S3–2S11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi S., Lotto A., Lewis D., Hoover B. & Stelmachowicz P. 2008. Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 51, 1042–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs D. 1982. Effects of hearing aid use on speech discrimination and listening effort. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 189–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downs D. & Crum M. 1978. Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. J Sp Hear Res, 21, (702–714).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feuerstein J. 1992. Monaural versus binaural hearing: Ease of listening, word recognition and attentional effort. Ear Hear, 13(2), 80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S., Gagné J.-P., Alepins M. & Dubois P. 2010. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: The effects of providing visual speech-cues. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 53, 18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant & Braida L. 1991. Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 2677–2690.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 1973. Attention and Effort. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kricos P. 2006. Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities. Trends in Amplification, 10(1), 1–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavie N. 1995. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol, 21(3), 451–468.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenberger U. & Baltes P. 1994. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychol Aging, 9, 339–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod A. & Summerfield Q. 1987. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. BJA, 21(2), 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod A. & Summerfield Q. 1990. A procedure for measuring auditory and audiovisual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. BJA, 24(1), 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy S., Tun P., Cox L., Colangelo M., Stewart R. . 2005. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchia G., Arum L., Nicol T.G., Garstecki D. & Krause N. 2009. Audiovisual deficits in older adults with hearing loss: Biological evidence. Ear Hear, 30(5), 505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAS-NRC. 1980. Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Report of working group 39. Committee on vision. Assembly of Behavioural and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. Advanced Ophthalmology, 41, 103–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasreddine Z., Phillips N.B.V. Charbonneau S., Whitehead V., Collin I. . 2005. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment J Am Geriatr Soc, 53, 695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler H. 1994. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychol Bull, 116(2), 220–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K. & Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing; implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification, 10(1), 29–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabbitt P. 1966. Recognition: Memory for words correctly heard in noise. Psychonomic Science, 6, 383–384.
   Google Scholar
• Rakerd B., Seitz P. & Whearty M. 1996. Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses. Ear Hear, 17(4), 97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse T.A. 1988. Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 8(3), 238–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scialfa C. 2002. The role of sensory factors in cognitive aging research. Canadian J Exp Psychol, 56(3), 153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoop C. & Binnie C.A. 1979. The effects of age upon the visual perception of speech. Scand Audiol, 8, 3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloan L.L., Rowland W.M. & Altman A. 1952. Comparison of three types of test target for measurement of visual acuity. Q Rev Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol, 8, 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Somberg B.L. & Salthouse T.A. 1982. Divided attention abilities in young and old adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 8, 651–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers M. S., Tye-Murray N. & Spehar B. 2005. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear Hear, 26, 263–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby W. & Pollack I. 1954. Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 26, 212–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun P., Benichov J. & Wingfield A. 2008. Effortful Processing of Spoken Sentences in Younger and Older Adults: Effects of Age and Hearing. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Tun P., McCoy S. & Wingfield A. 2009. Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional cost of effortful listening. Psychol Aging, 24(3), 761–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden B.E., Busacco D.A. & Montgomery A.A. 1993. Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons. J Sp Hear Res, 36(2), 431–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield A. & Tun P. 2001. Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield A. & Tun P. 2007. Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Acad Audiol, 18(7), 548–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar