References
- Bench J., Kowal A., Bamford J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Brit J Audiol, 13, 108–108.
- British Society of Audiology. 1981. Recommended procedures for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol, 15, 213–216.
- Crandell C., Charlton M., Kinder M. & Kreisman B. 2002. Effects of portable sound field FM systems on speech perception in noise. J Edu Audiol, 9, 8–8.
- Crandell C. & Smaldino J. 2001. Improving classroom acoustics: Utilizing hearing-assistive technology and communication strategies in the educational setting. Volta Rev, 101, 47–47.
- Fabry D. 1994. Noise reduction with FM systems in FM/EM mode. Ear Hear, 15, 82–86.
- Games P. & Howell J. 1976. Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J Edu Behav Stat, 1, 113–113.
- Groth J. 2010. Five myths about digital wireless hearing aid technology. Hear Rev, 17, 24–30.
- Haas H. 1972. Influence of a single echo on the audibility of speech. J Audio Eng Soc, 20, 146–159.
- Harkins J. & Tucker P. 2007. An internet survey of individuals with hearing loss regarding assistive listening devices. Trends Amplif, 11, 91–91.
- Hawkins D. 1984. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 409–418.
- Humes L. 1996. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 161–167.
- Humes L. & Roberts L. 1990. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 726–726.
- Köbler S., Lindblad A., Olofsson A. & Hagerman B. 2010. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance. Int J Audiol, 49, 613–613.
- Kreisman B. & Crandell C. 2003. Effects of behind-the-ear frequency modulation systems on speech perception. J Edu Audiol, 10, 21–21.
- Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–477
- Lewis M., Crandell C., Valente M. & Horn J. 2004. Speech perception in noise: Directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 426–426.
- MacLeod A. & Summerfield Q. 1990. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol, 24, 29–29.
- Marrone N., Mason C. & Kidd G. 2008. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem. Trends Amplif, 12, 300–300.
- Pittman A., Lewis D., Hoover B. & Stelmachowicz P. 1999. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions. Ear Hear, 20, 279–279.
- Ricketts T. & Dhar S. 1998. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 180–180.
- Smoorenburg G. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
- Stone M. & Moore B. 2003. Tolerable hearing-aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear Hear, 24, 175–175.
- Stone M., Moore B., Meisenbacher K. & Derleth R. 2008. Tolerable hearing aid delays V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings. Ear Hear, 29, 601–617.
- Takahashi G & Bacon S. 1992. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 1410–1421.
- Thibodeau L. & Saucedo K. 1991. Consistency of electroacoustic characteristics across components of FM systems. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 628–628.
- Valente M. & Mispagel K. 2008. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 47, 329–329.
- Walden B., Surr R., Cord M., Edwards B. & Olson L. 2000. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 540–540.
- Zurek P. 1993. Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In: G. Studebaker, I Hochberg (eds.) Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, Boston: Allyn Bacon, pp. 255–276.