References
- Armstrong S. 1993. Dynamics of compression: Some key elements explored. Hear J, 46(11), 1–4.
- Beard J. & Nepomuceno H. 2001 Wind noise levels for an ITE hearing aid. Knowles Engineering Report, 128, Revision A.
- Bentler R. & Chiou L-K. 2006. Digital noise reduction: An overview. Trends Amplif, 10, 67–82.
- Boymans M. & Dreschler W.A. 2000. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual microphone directionality. Audiol, 39, 260–268.
- Brown D.V. & Mongeau L.G. 1995. The design, construction, and validation of a small, low-speed, quiet wind tunnel with application to noise from the flow over a cavity. Internal Report 204, HL95-9. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University.
- Burkhard M.D. & Sachs R.M. 1975. Anthopometric manikin for acoustic research. J Am Acad Audiol, 58, 214–222.
- Chung K. 2004. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids, Part I: Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms. Trends Amplif, 8, 83–124.
- Chung K., Zeng F.G. & Acker K.N. 2006. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2216–2227.
- Chung K., Mongeau L. & McKibben N. 2009. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 2243–59.
- Chung K., McKibben N. & Mongeau L. 2010. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 2529–2542.
- Cox R.M. 1999. Five years later: An update on the IHAFF fitting protocol. Hear J, 52, 10–18.
- Dillon H. 1996. Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times? Ear Hear, 17, 287–307.
- Fortune T. & Preves D. 1994. Effects of CIC, ITC, and ITE microphone placement on the amplification of wind noise. Hear J, 47, 23–27.
- Grenner J., Abrahamsson U., Jernberg B. & Lindblad S. 2000. A comparison of wind noise in four hearing instruments. Scand Audiol, 29, 171–4.
- Holube I. & Velde T.M. 2000. DSP Hearing Instruments. In: R.E. Sandlin (ed.), Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification, San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 285–321.
- Kates J.M. & Arehart K.H. 2005. Multi-channel dynamic-range compression using digital frequency warping. EURASIP J Appl Sig Processing, 2005, 3003–3014.
- Kates J.M. 2008. Digital Hearing Aids. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc.
- Kuk F.K. 1996. Theoretical and practical considerations in compression hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 1, 5–39.
- Mueller H., Weber J. & Hornsby B. 2006. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif, 10, 83–93.
- Palmer C.V., Bentler R. & Mueller H.G. 2006. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds. Trends Amplif, 10, 95–104.
- Powers T.A., Holube I. & Wesselkamp M. 1999. The use of digital features to combat background noise. In: High Performance Hearing Solutions, Vol. 3: Hearing in Noise, Hear Review, Suppl., 36–39.
- Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B. & Hafter E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 1230–1240.
- Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 1992. Syllabic compression: Effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. Br J Audiol, 26, 351–356.
- Souza P.E. 2002. Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility and sound quality. Trends Amplif, 6, 131–165.
- Thompson S. 2002. Microphones, Receivers, and Telecoils inHearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations. Edited by M. Valente. New York; Thiemes.
- Thompson S. & Dillon H. 2002. Wind noise in hearing aids. Presented at American Academy of Audiology Convention, Philadelphia, PA, USA.