544
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A conversation analytic view of continuous discourse tracking as a rehabilitative tool

&
Pages 43-53 | Received 03 Feb 2011, Accepted 02 Sep 2011, Published online: 21 Nov 2011

References

  • Atkinson J.M. & Heritage J. (eds.) 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berg B.E. 2009. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Seventh Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Boothroyd A. 2007. Adult aural rehabilitation: What is it and does it work? Trends Amplif, 11, 63–71.
  • Brink P. & Stones M. 2007. Examination of the relationship among hearing impairment, linguistic communication, mood, and social engagement of residents in complex continuing-care facilities. Gerontologist, 47, 633–641.
  • Caissie R., Dawe A.L., Donovan C., Brooks H. & MacDonald S.M. 1998. Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 31, 45–67.
  • Chelst T.S., Tait C.A. & Gallagher T.M. 1990. Linguistic strategies used by normally-hearing caregivers in conversations with elderly hearing-impaired spouses. In: D.E. Biegel & A. Blum (eds.), Aging and Caregiving: Theory, Research and Policy. Newberry Park: Sage, pp. 204–218.
  • Clark H.H. & Schaefer E.F. 1987. Collaborating on contributions to conversation. Lang Cogn Process, 2, 19–41.
  • Curl T.S. 2005. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes, 39, 1–43.
  • Danz A.D. & Binnie C.A. 1983. Quantification of the effects of training the auditory-visual reception of connected speech. Ear Hear, 4, 146–151.
  • de Filippo C.L. & Scott B.L. 1978. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 1186–1192.
  • Erber N.P. 1996. Communication Therapy for Hearing-Impaired Adults. Melbourne, Australia: Clavis.
  • Erber N.P. & Lind C. 1994. Communication therapy: Theory and practice. In: J.-P. Gagn & N. Tye-Murray (eds.), Research in Audiological Rehabilitation: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, Monograph Supplement Volume XXVII, pp. 267–287.
  • Fenn G. & Smith B.Z.D. 1987. The assessment of lipreading ability: Some practical considerations in the use of the tracking procedure. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 253–258.
  • Ferguson A. 1998. Conversational turn-taking and repair in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 12, 1007–1031.
  • Geluykens R. 1988. On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions. J Pragmat, 12, 467–485.
  • Golab J. & Lind C. 2009. Conversation Repair and Adult Cochlear Implantation. Paper presented at the Speech Pathology Australia National Conference 2009, Adelaide.
  • Gray R.F., Bagueley D.M., Harries M.L., Court I. & Lynch C.C. 1993. Profound deafness treated by the ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol, 107, 673–680.
  • Gunlogson C. 2003. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. New York: Routledge.
  • Hutchby I. & Wooffitt R. 1998. Conversation Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.
  • Kaplan H., Bally S.J. & Garretson C. 1985. Speechreading: A Way to Improve Understanding. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
  • Le Roux L. & Turton R.W. 1990. Methodological considerations in employing the continuous discourse tracking procedure with hearing-impaired adults. S Afr J Commun Disord, 37, 51–57.
  • Lesner S.A. & Kricos P.B. 1987. Tracking as a communication enhancement strategy with nursing home residents. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 20, 39–48.
  • Lesner S.A., Lynn J.M. & Brainard J. 1988. Feasibility of using a single-subject design for continuous discourse tracking measurement. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 21, 83–89.
  • Lind C. 2006. Conversation Repair and Adult Acquired Hearing Impairment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queensland University.
  • Lind C. 2009. Conversation repair strategies in audiologic rehabilitation. In: J. Montano & J. Spitzer (eds.), Advanced Practice in Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation: International Perspectives. San Diego: Plural, pp. 217–241.
  • Lind C., Campbell K., Davey A., Rodgers L., Seipolt C. . 2010. Some prosodic characteristics of repeated talk following conversation repair requests by adults with hearing impairment. Seminars in Hearing, 31, 127–139.
  • Lind C., Hickson L. & Erber N.P. 2004. Conversation repair and acquired hearing impairment: A preliminary quantitative clinical study. ANZJA, 26, 40–52.
  • Lind C., Hickson L. & Erber N.P. 2006. Conversation repair and adult cochlear implantation: A qualitative case study. Cochlear Implants Int, 7, 33–48.
  • Lunato K.E. & Weisenberger J.M. 1994. Comparative effectiveness of correction strategies in connected discourse tracking. Ear Hear, 15, 362–370.
  • Merrison S. & Merrison A.J. 2005. Repair in speech and language therapy interaction: Investigating pragmatic language impairment of children. Child Lang Teach Ther, 21, 191–211.
  • Orange J.B., Lubinski R.B. & Higginbotham D.J. 1996. Conversational repair by individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 881–895.
  • Osberger M.J., Johnson, D.L. & Miller J.D. 1987. Use of connected discourse tracking to train functional speech skills. Ear Hear, 8, 31–36.
  • Owens E. & Raggio M. 1987. The UCSF tracking procedure for evaluation and training of speech reception by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Disord, 52, 120–128.
  • Owens E. & Telleen C.C. 1981. Tracking as an aural rehabilitative process. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 14, 259–273.
  • Pichora-Fuller M.K., Johnson C.E. & Roodenburg K.E.J. 1998. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: Balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Appl Commmun Res, 26, 99–119.
  • Proops D.W., Donaldson I., Cooper H.R., Thomas J., Burrell S.P. . 1999. Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients. J Laryngol Otol, 113, 5–13.
  • Sacks H., Schegloff E.A. & Jefferson G. 1974. The simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
  • Schegloff E.A. 1987. Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201–218.
  • Schegloff E.A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. Am J Sociol, 97, 1295–1345.
  • Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G. & Sacks H. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
  • Skelt L. 2007. Damage control: Closing problematic sequences in hearing-impaired interaction. ARAL, 30, 34.1–34.15.
  • Stephens D., Gianopoulos I. & Kerr P. 2001. Determination and classification of the problems experienced by hearing-impaired elderly people. Audiology, 40, 294–300.
  • Tye-Murray N. & Witt S. 1996. Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear-implant users. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 29, 11–25.
  • Tye-Murray N., Witt S. & Schum L. 1995. Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversations with adult cochlear-implant users. Ear Hear, 16, 459–469.
  • Wardhaugh R. 1985. How Conversation Works. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Weisenberger J.M., Broadstone S.M. & Saunders F.A. 1989. Evaluation of two multichannel tactile aids for the hearing impaired. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 1764–1775.
  • Wilson J., Hickson L. & Worrall L. 1998. Use of communication strategies by adults with hearing impairment. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear, 3, 29–41.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.