Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study

References

• Brand T. & Kollmeier B., 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 111(6), 2801–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W.A., Verschuure H., Ludvigsen C. & Westermann S. 2001. ICRA noises: Artifcial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. Audiology, 40, 148–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Festen J.M. & Plomp R. 1990. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(4), 1725–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart T., van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2011. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests. Int J Audiol, 50(1), 2–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J., 1989. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scand Audiol, 32, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. & Kinnefors C. 1995. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernvig L.H. & Olsen S.O. 2005. Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold. Int J Audiol, 44, 509–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frache B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49(5), 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. & Elliott L.L. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 61(5), 1337–1351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laroche C., Vaillancourt V., Melanson C., Renault M., Thériault C. . 2006. Adaptation du HINT (hearing in noise test) pour les enfants francophones canadiens et données préliminaires sur l'effet d'âge. Revue d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, 30(2), 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Luts H., Boon E., Wable J. & Wouters J. 2008. FIST: A French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 47, 373–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95(2), 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordhoek I.M., Houtgast T. & Festen J.M. 2001. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions both in the 1-kHz frequency region. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(3), 1197–1212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozimek E., Warzybok A. & Kutzner D. 2010. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Int J Audiol, 49(6), 444–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91(1), 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen M., Swanepoel D.W. & Hanekom J. 2009. Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests. Int J Audiol, 48(11), 743–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt V., Laroche C., Mayer C., Basque C., Nali M. . 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt V., Laroche C., Mayer C., Basque C., Nali M. . 2008. The Canadian French Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol, 47, 383–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2008. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden S.J., Steeneken H.J.M. & Houtgast T. 2002. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 112(6), 3004–3013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M. & Houtgast T., 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for effcient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107(3), 1671–1684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999b. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38(2), 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999c. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38(3), 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 2006. The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol, 45, 26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Josvassen J.L. & Ardenkjar R. 2003. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Kühnel V. & Kollmeier B. 1999a. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wioland F. 1972. Estimation de la fréquence des phonèmes en français parlé. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique de l'Université de Strasbourg, 4, 177–204.
   Google Scholar