Acceptable noise level: Repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing

References

• Altman D.G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen J.R. 1983. Samsø Rundt. Tranebjerg: Flemming Andersens Bookstore.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton D.E., Boers M. & Wells G.A. 2002. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): A literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 14, 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Nuetzel J.M., Rabinowitz W.M. & Rzeczkowski C. 1984. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 32–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland J.M. & Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 327, 307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström K.J., Lantz J., Nielsen L.H. & Olsen S.Ø. 2012. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish and non-semantic speech materials. Int J Audiol, 51, 146–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K. . 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Ludvigsen C. & Lyregaard P.E. 1989. Dantale: A new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol, 18, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin C.A., Thelin J.W., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2006. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Nabelek A.K., Burchfield S.B. & Thelin J.W. 2005a. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 228–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Plyle P.N., Thelins J.W & Hedrick M.S. 2007. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Smiley D.F., Muenchen R.A. & Konrad T.N. 2006. Acceptable noise level: Reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 640–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.F., Thelin, J.W., Plyler P.N., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2005b. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 677–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holube I., Fredelake S., Vlaming M. & Kollmeier B. 2010. Development and analysis of an international speech test signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol, 49, 891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-2. 1998. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear- Part 2: An interim acoustic coupler for the calibration of audiometric earphones in the extended high-frequency range. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-5. 2006. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8 kHz to 16 kHz. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-8. 2004. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, pp. 389.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1. 1998. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods part 1: Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jerlvall L. & Arlinger S. 1986. A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. Scand Aud, 15, 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller H.G., Weber J. & Hornsby B.W. 2006. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Ampl, 10, 83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Freyaldenhoven M.C., Tampas J.W., Burchfiel S.B. & Muenchen R.A. 2006. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 626–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Burchfield S.B. 2004. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 47, 1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Freyaldenhoven M.C. 2007. Further questions about the acceptable noise level test: A response to Dr. Hamill. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 185–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tucker F.M. & Letowski T.R. 1991. Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 679–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers D.S., Harkrider A.W., Burchfield S.B. & Nabelek A.K. 2003. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 372–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tampas J.W. & Harkrider A.W. 2006. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1548–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hapsburg D. & Bahng J. 2006. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters J., Litière L. & van Wieringen A. 1999. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids. Audiology, 38, 91–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar