Prediction of aided and unaided audiograms using sound-field auditory steady-state evoked responses

References

• Attias J., Buller N., Rubel Y. & Raveh E. 2006a. Multiple auditory steady-state responses in children and adults with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, or auditory neuropathy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 115 (4), 268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J., Al-Masri M., AbuKader L., Cohen G. & Merlov P. 2006b. The prevalence of congenital and early onset hearing loss in Jordanian and Israeli infants. Int J Audiol, 45(9), 528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R. & Keidser G. 2001. NALNL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Weson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G. & Ming W.J. 2002. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 173–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson S.A., Wall L.G. & Goodman C.M. 1990. Preliminary studies on use of an ABR amplitude projection procedure for hearing aid selection. Ear Hear, 11(5), 332–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., van-Roon P. & Picton T.W. 2001. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear, 22, 100–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van Room P., Purcell D. & Adamonis J. 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13(4), 205–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Beauchaine K.A. & Reiland J.K. 1987. Comparison of onset and steady-state responses of hearing aids: Implications for use of the auditory brainstem response in the selection of hearing aids. Speech Hear Res, 30, 130–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harlor A.D. & Bower C. 2009. Committee on practice and ambulatory medicine, Section on otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: Hearing assessment in infants and children: Recommendations beyond neonatal screening. Pediatrics, 124(4), 1252–1263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hecox K. 1983. Role of auditory brainstem response in the selection of hearing aids. Ear Hear, 4, 51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning G.B. 1974. Delectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. J Acoust Soc Am, 55(1), 84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 389–2. 1994. Acoustics—reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment—part 2: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. 1973. Diagnostic audiometry. In: J. Jerger (ed.).Modern Developments in Audiology: Second edition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 75–113.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Chmiel R., Frost J.D. & Coker N. 1986. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. Ear Hear, 7(4), 240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S. & Picton T.W. 2000. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 61(2), 125–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., van-Roon P. & Picton T.W. 2001. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neuro-Otol, 6, 12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A., Durrant J.D., Sabo D.L., Boston J.R., Taubman L.B. . 2006a. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: Evaluation in an empirical design, Int J Audiol, 45, 211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A , Sabo D.L., Durrant J.D. & Rubinstein E. 2006b. Reliability of electric response audiometry using the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response: Evaluation in an empirical design, Int J Audiol, 45, 477–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J. 1982. Hearing aid selection by brainstem audiometry. Scand Audiol, 11, 269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny P.R. 1982. Auditory brainstem responses as indications of hearing aid performance. Ann Otolaryngol, 91, 61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A. & Champagne S.C. 1996. Frequency specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 17(2), 81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littman T.A., Blakenship K.K., Koenig J.A. 2002. Fitting hearing aids on infants and children: A primer for otolaryngologists. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America35(4), 791–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney T.M. 1985. Auditory brainstem response hearing aid application. In: Jacobson (ed.), The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego: College Hill Press, pp. 349–370.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. & Pasanen E.G. 1976. Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am, 59(3), 634–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 1989. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., Whittingham J. & Moran L.M. 1998. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. JAm Acad Audiol, 9, 315–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton W.S., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42 (4), 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Dowell R.C., Rickards F. ., Beer D.E. & Clark G.M. 1998. Steady state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear, 19, 48–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S. & Seewald R. 2001. Hearing aid fitting and verification procedures for children. In: Katz (ed.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia USA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, pp. 687–706.
   Google Scholar
• Serpanos Y.C., O’Malley H. & Gravel J.S. 1997. The relationship between loudness intensity functions and the click-ABR wave V latency. Ear Hear, 18, 409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik A.F.M. & Stollman M.H.P. 1998. Fitting preschool and primary school children with hearing aids: An evaluation of hearing aid prescription rules. Seewald (ed.) A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification: Proceedings of an International Conference. Stafa, Switzerland: Phomak AG.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G. & Lewis D.E. 1988. Some theoretical considerations concerning the relation between functional gain and insertion gain. J Speech Hear Res, 31, 491–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroebel D., Swanepoel de W. & Groenewald E. 2007. Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants. Int J Audiol, 46, 287–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlumak A.I., Rubinstein E. & Durrant J.D. 2007. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Int J Audiol, 46, 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber L.A., Kruger B. & Killion M.C. 1988. Reference thresholds for the ER-3A insert phone. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 669–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis P.A. & Decker R.I. 1964. On the short increment sensitivity index (SISI test). J Speech Hear Disord, 29, 231–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C. 2004. Levels of evidence: Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord, 37(5), 451–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar