341
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain

, &
Pages 906-913 | Received 22 Jan 2012, Accepted 05 Jun 2012, Published online: 01 Oct 2012

References

  • Agnew J. & Thornton J.M. 2000. Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 330–336.
  • Blamey P.J., Martin L.F.A. & Fiket H.J. 2004. A digital processing strategy to optimize hearing aid outputs directly. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 716–728.
  • Blamey P.J., Macfarlane D.S. & Steele B.R. 2005. An intrinsically digital amplification scheme for hearing aids. EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing, 18, 3026–3033.
  • Borodin A. (1833–1887). String Quartet No 2: Nocturne [Recorded by the Queensland Symphony Orchestra], On: Life is Beautiful [Compact Disc], ABC Classic FM (2005).
  • Bramsløw L. 2010. Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings. Int J Audiol, 49, 634–644.
  • Dickson B. & Steele B.R. 2010. Method and device for low delay processing. United States Patent Number 7, 774, 396.
  • Dillon H., Keidser G., O'Brien A. & Silberstein H. 2003. Sound quality comparisons of advanced hearing aids. Hearing Journal, 56(4), 30–40.
  • Frye G.J. 2001. Testing digital and analog hearing instruments: Processing time delays and phase measurements. Hearing Review, 8(10), 34–40.
  • Groth J. & Søndergaard M.B. 2004. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings. Int J Audiol, 43, 594–599.
  • Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B.R. 1997. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neuroscience, 3, 289–311.
  • Pergolesi G.B. (1710–1736). Stabat Mater [Recorded by the Cologne Chamber Orchestra]. On Pergolesi Stabat Mater Salve Regina [Compact Disc], Naxos (2006).
  • Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 1999. Tolerable hearing-aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear Hear, 20(3), 182–192.
  • Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 2002. Tolerable hearing-aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production. Ear Hear, 23(4), 325–338.
  • Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 2003. Tolerable hearing-aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear Hear, 24(2), 175–183.
  • Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Tolerable hearing-aid delays: IV. Effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects. Ear Hear, 26(2), 225–235.
  • Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J., Meisenbacher K. & Derleth R.P. 2008. Tolerable hearing-aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings. Ear Hear, 29(4), 601–617.
  • Turner C.W., Zwislocki J.J. & Filion P.R. 1989. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 86(1), 109–115.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.