2,015
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: The limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction

, , &
Pages 29-36 | Received 14 Dec 2012, Accepted 20 Jun 2012, Published online: 29 Aug 2012

References

  • Alcantara J.L., Moore B.C., Kuhnel V. & Launer S. 2003. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 42, 34–42.
  • Barrenas M.L. & Wikstrom I. 2000. The influence of hearing and age on speech recognition scores in noise in audiological patients and in the general population. Ear Hear, 21, 569–577.
  • Bentler R.A., Egge J.L., Tubbs J.L., Dittberner A.B. & Flamme G.A. 2004. Quantification of directional benefit across different polar response patterns. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 649–659.
  • Boymans M. & Dreschler W.A. 2000. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology, 39, 260–268.
  • Brannstrom K.J. & Wennerstrom I. 2010. Hearing-aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512–521.
  • Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 106s–115S.
  • Cox R.M. , Stephens D. & Kramer S.E. 2002. Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol, 41, 3–26.
  • Flynn M. 2004. Maitaining the directional advantage in open fittings. Hear Rev, 11, 32–36.
  • Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
  • Hagerman B. & Kinnefors C. 1995. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 71–77.
  • Hallgren M. , Larsby B. & Arlinger S. 2006. A Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 45, 227–237.
  • Hawkins D.B. & Yacullo W.S. 1984. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 278–286.
  • Hessefort K. 2010. High spontaneous acceptance and excellent customer satisfaction. Field Study News: Phonak hearing systems.
  • Kuk F. , Keenan D. & Lau C.C. 2009. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 480–491.
  • Kuk F. , Keenan D. & Ludvigsen C. 2005. Efficacy of an open-fitting hearing aid. Hear Rev, 12, 26–31.
  • Magnusson L. 1995. Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 217–223.
  • Nilsson M. , Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
  • Peeters H. , Kuk F. , Lau C.C. & Keenan D. 2009. Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 89–98.
  • Pumford J.M. , Seewald R.C. , Scollie S.D. & Jenstad L.M. 2000. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 23–35.
  • Ricketts T. 2000a. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: Fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear, 21, 45–58.
  • Ricketts T. 2000b. Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear, 21, 194–205.
  • Ricketts T. & Dahr S. 1999. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 180–189.
  • Ricketts T. , Henry P. & Gnewikow D. 2003. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear, 24, 424–439.
  • Ricketts T. & Mueller H.G. 2000. Predicting directional hearing-aid benefit for individual listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 561–569.
  • Ricketts T.A. & Hornsby B.W. 2005. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 270–277.
  • Wagener K. , Josvassen J.L. & Ardenkjaer R. 2003. Design, optimization, and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10–17.
  • Valente M. , Fabry D.A. & Potts L.G. 1995. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 440–449.
  • Valente M. & Mispagel K.M. 2008. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 47, 329–336.
  • Vestergaard M.D. 2006. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol, 45, 382–392.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.