Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs

References

• Abdala C., Mishra S.K. & Williams T.L. 2010. Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 1584–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Hurley A., Wen H. & Kemp D.T. 1995. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res, 87, 6–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D. & Kemp D.T. 1993. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 920–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L., Veuiller E., Bene J. & Morgon A. 1992. Effects of contralateral white noise on click evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: Towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology, 31, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper N.P. & Guinan J.J. 2006. Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion. J Physiol, 576, 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis N.A. & Guinan J.J. 2010. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths. Hear Res, 267, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A.L., Perrin E., Chéry-Croze S., Chays A. & Collet L. 1996. Contralateral acoustic stimulation induces a phase advance in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res, 94, 54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A.L., Wable J., Chays A., Collet L. & Chéry-Croze S. 1997. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: Is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2219–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan Jr. J.J. 2006. Olivocochlear efferents: Anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear, 27, 589–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan Jr. J.J. & Gifford M.L. 1988. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory nerve fibers. III. Tuning curve and thresholds at CF. Hear Res, 37, 29–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R. & Probst R. 1991. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henin S., Thompson S., Abdelrazeq S. & Long G.R. 2011. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 2068–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase T., Ogura M., Hidaka H., Sasaki N., Suzuki Y. . 2000. Effects of contralateral noise on measurement of psychophysical tuning curve. Hear Res, 142, 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D.T. & Chum R. 1980. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res, 2, 213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight R.D. & Kemp D.T. 2001. Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 1513–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineton B. & Wildgoose C.M.B. 2009. Comparing two proposed measures of cochlear mechanical filter bandwidth based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 1558–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maison S.F. & Liberman M.C. 2000. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J Neurosci, 20, 4701–4707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller J., Janssen T., Heppelmann G. & Wagner W. 2005. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 3747–3756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugasu E. & Russell I.J. 1996. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci, 16, 325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O Mahoney C.F. & Kemp D.T. 1995. Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3721–3735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan S., Kemp D.T. & Hinchcliffe R. 1991. The influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on click-evoked otoacoustic emission in humans. Br J Audiol, 25, 391–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quaranta N., Scaringi A., Nahum S. & Quaranta A. 2005. Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 520–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schairer K.S., Ellison J.C., Fitzpatrick D. & Keefe D.H. 2006. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 901–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C.A. & Guinan Jr. J.J. 1999. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 782–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C.A., Talmadge C.L. & Tubis A. 2000. Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: Their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 2933–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souter M. 1995. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Hear Res, 91, 167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X.M. 2008. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 4310–4320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay & Moore B.C. 2008. Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency. Hear Res, 240, 93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withnell R.H. & McKinley S. 2005. Delay dependence for the origin of the nonlinear derived transient evoked otoacoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 281–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates G.K. & Withnell R.H. 1999. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 136, 49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig G. & Shera C.A. 1995. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 2018–2047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar