326
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Auditory steady state response in sound field

&
Pages 139-143 | Received 25 Aug 2011, Accepted 26 Aug 2012, Published online: 23 Nov 2012

References

  • Attias J., Buller N., Rubel Y. & Raveh E. 2006. Multiple auditory steady-state responses in children and adults with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, or auditory neuropathy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 4, 268–276.
  • Brooke R.E., Brennan S.K. & Stevens J.C.H. 2009. Bone conduction auditory steady state response: Investigations into reducing artifact. Ear Hear, 30, 23–30.
  • Cone-Wesson B., Rickards F., Poullis C., Parker J., Tan L. . 2002. The auditory steady-state response. III: Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 270–282.
  • Carhart R. & Jerguer J.F. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure–tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330–345.
  • Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., van Roon P. . 2001. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear, 22, 100–111.
  • Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van R.P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J. . 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13(4), 205–224.
  • Dimitrijevic A., John M.S. & Picton T.W. 2004. Auditory state-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear, 25, 68–84.
  • Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Hoover B.M. . 2004. Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements. Ear Hear, 25, 302–307.
  • Hatzopoulos S., Prosser S., Ciorba A., Giarbini N., Kochanek K. . 2010. Threshold estimation in adult normal- and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses. Med Sci Monit, 16, 23–28.
  • Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.R. 2003. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorinerural hearing impairment. Int J Audiol, 42, 237–248.
  • ISO 389-7 1998. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - Part 7: Reference threshold of hearing under free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions. International Organization for Standardization.
  • John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., van Roon P. & Picton T.W. 2001. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 12–27.
  • Lins O.G. & Picton T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420–432.
  • Lins O.G., Picton P.E., Picton T.W., Champagne S.C. & Durieux-Smith A. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80 to 110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3051–3063.
  • Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A. Champagne S.C. . 1996. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state response. Ear Hear, 17, 81–96.
  • Mardia K., Kent J. & Bibby J. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
  • Pérez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E. . 2001. Steady-state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific threshold in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 22, 200–211.
  • Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., Whittingham J., Moran L.M. . 1998. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state response. J Am Acad Audiol, 9(1), 315–331.
  • Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42(4), 177–219.
  • Picton T.W. & John M.S. 2004. Avoiding electromagnetic artefacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 541–554.
  • Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T. De Vidi S. & Clark G.M. 1995. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady state evoked potentials. Ear Hear, 16, 499–507.
  • Rance G. & Briggs R.J.S. 2002. Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: The Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111 (suppl. 189), 22–28.
  • Rance G. & Tomlin D. 2006. Maturation of auditory steady-state responses in normal babies. Ear Hear, 27, 20–29.
  • Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2004. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 25, 611–623.
  • Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to bone-conducted stimuli in adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 172–183.
  • Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2006. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to bone-conducted stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 27, 219–228.
  • Swanepoel D. & Hugo R. 2004. Estimations of auditory sensitivity for young cochlear implant candidates using the ASSR: Preliminary results. Int J Audiol, 43(7), 377–382.
  • Tlumank A.I., Rubinstein E. & Durrant J.D. 2007. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Int J Audiol, 46, 692–710.
  • Valdés J.L., Pérez-Abalo M.C., Martín V., Savio G., Sierra C. . 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80-Hz auditory steady-state response. Ear Hear, 18(3), 420–429.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.