Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing

References

• Andersson G., Melin L., Lindberg P. & Scott B. 1995. Development of a short scale for self-assessment of experiences of hearing loss: The hearing coping assessment. Scand Audiol, 24(3), 147–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold D.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 1996. Influence of ultra-high frequency hearing on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions levels in humans. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Badri R., Siegel J.H. & Wright B.A. 2011. Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am, 129(2), 852–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21(Suppl 4), S37–S49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coren S. & Hakstian A.R. 1992. The development and cross-validation of a self-report inventory to assess pure-tone threshold hearing sensitivity. J Speech Hear Res, 35(4), 921–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corthals P., Vinck B., De Vel E. & Van Cauwenberge P. 1997. Audiovisual speech reception in noise and self-perceived hearing disability in sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol, 36(1), 46–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis A., Smith P., Ferguson M., Stephens D. & Gianopoulos I. 2007. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: A study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess, 11(42), 1–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B. 2002. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag Norway: I. Distributions by age, gender, and ear side. Int J Audiol, 41(1), 64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B. & Tambs K. 2002. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway: II. Effects of noise, head injuries, and ear infections. Int J Audiol, 41(1), 78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B., Tambs K., Borchgrevink H.M. & Hoffman H.J. 2005a. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway: III. Relationships with pure-tone hearing thresholds. Int J Audiol, 44(1), 15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B., Tamb K., Borchgrevink H.M. & Hoffman H.J. 2005b. Screened and unscreened hearing threshold levels for the adult population: Results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study. Int J Audiol, 44(4), 213–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. 1990. The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 476, 249–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43(2), 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez M.I., Hwang S.A., Sobotova L., Stark A.D., & May J.J. 2001. A comparison of self-reported hearing loss and audiometry in a cohort of New York farmers. Speech Lang Hear Res, 44(6), 1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Lantz J. & Fitzgibbons P. 1994. Age effects on measures of hearing disability. Ear Hear, 15(3), 262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto H., Nomura K.Yano E. 2004. Psychosomatic status affects the relationship between subjective hearing difficulties and the results of audiometry. J Clin Epidemiol, 57(4), 381–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain D.M., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Keefe D.H. & Peters J. 1998. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss (in process citation). Ear Hear, 19(6), 434–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D.T., Bray P., Alexander L. & Brown A.M. 1986. Acoustic emission cochleography: Practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl, 25, 71–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kempen G.I., van Heuvelen M.J., van den Brink R.H., Kooijman A.C., Klein M. . 1996. Factors affecting contrasting results between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitation. Age Ageing, 25(6), 458–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike K.J., Hurst M.K. & Wetmore S.J. 1994. Correlation between the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery five-minute hearing test and standard audiologic data. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 111(5), 625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M. & Tobi H. 1996. The relationships between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability. Audiol, 35(5), 277–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A. & Marshall L. 2007. Otoacoustic emissions as a preclinical measure of NIHL and susceptibility to NIHL. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions, Clinical Application, 3rd ed. >New York: Thieme. pp. 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• LePage E.L. & Murray N.M. 1993. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: Comparing emission strengths with pure-tone audiometric thresholds. Austr J Audiol, 15(2), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M.E., Brown E.J. & Coles R.R. 1987. Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex, and type of hearing loss. Br J Audiol, 21(1), 45–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutman M.E. & Saunders G.H. 1992. Lack of association between otoacoustic emissions and hearing difficulty in subjects with normal hearing thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 92(2, Pt 1), 1184–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers C., Bernard C., Iburg K., Inoue M., Fat D. . 2003. Global Burden of Disease 2000: Version 2 Methods and Results. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer A.G., Wit H.P., TenVergert E.M., Albers F.W. & Muller Kobold J.E. 2003. Reliability and validity of the (modified) Amsterdam inventory for auditory disability and handicap. Int J Audiol, 42(4), 220–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X.L., Rosenthal R. & Rubin D.B. 1992. Comparing correlated correlation-coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills D.M. 2006. Determining the cause of hearing loss: Differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Ear Hear, 27(5), 508–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman C.W., Weinstein B.E., Jacobson G.P. & Hug G.A. 1990. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear, 11(6), 430–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. & Daneman M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97(1), 593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A., Macdonald E., Pass H.E. & Brown S. 2006. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hear Res, 223(1–2), 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries P.W. 1994. Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990–91. Vital Health Stat, 10(188), 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sindhusake D., Mitchell P., Smith W., Golding M., Newall P. . 2001. Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Int J Epidemiol, 30(6), 1371–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kramer S.E. & Houtgast T. 2006. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population. Ear Hear, 27(5), 538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt S. 2008. Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: A modelling approach. Int J Audiol, 47(Suppl 2), S10–S15.
   Google Scholar
• Tambs K. 2004. Moderate effects of hearing loss on mental health and subjective well-being: Results from the Nord-Trondelag hearing loss study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(5), 776–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida Y., Nakashima T., Ando F., Niino N. & Shimokata H. 2003. Prevalence of self-perceived auditory problems and their relation to audiometric thresholds in a middle-aged to elderly population. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 123(5), 618–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley T.L., Cruickshanks K.J., Nondahl D.M. & Tweed T.S. 2000. Self- reported hearing handicap and audiometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 11(2), 67–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1999. International Classification of Impairments, Activities and Participation. A Manual of Dimensions of Disablement and Functioning.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao F. & Stephens D. 2006. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome. Int J Audiol, 45(1), 34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar